Conflict Regulation in the 15th Century. Feuds, Comparisons and Arbitrational Tribunals of the Counts of Nassau-Saarbrücken.

该项目打算出版一本专著，以拿骚-萨尔布吕肯县为基础，分析15世纪解决冲突的策略--妥协和仲裁庭，进一步讨论它们的帝国气质中的相对冲突，并审查参与庭外法律和解的个人，这些人涉及他们的法律教育和他们的宫廷联系。文件规定了多阶段程序(rachtung/anlass/komproplz)，与包括证据(forderungen、antworten、wide reden和nachreden)在内的争议点有关的通信以及契据(entscheidt/Spruch/kommiss)是对妥协和仲裁庭的程序性重建。妥协的丰富来源(fruntlich/mynne/gutlich)和仲裁庭(mynne and recht/frundliches)中的系统术语。Gutliches Recht/gewill kurter Prozess)允许将这些法律文书分开。最重要的文件应该以印刷和数字形式编辑，因为除了一般的可用性(在地区历史、官方或地区语言分析中)，它们应该在哥廷根大学数字人文教席和数字人文中心的一个项目中重新使用。以下工作假设变得明显：(1)这场争执是解决庄园主张冲突的三个步骤中的第一步，其次是在一次会议上进行了比较，最后将悬而未决的问题提交仲裁庭。这样，一种侵略、比较和仲裁庭解决法律争端的运作方式将是显而易见的。(2)韦斯特里奇庄园的碎片化和许多领土间的冲突可能是拿骚-萨尔布吕肯频繁的庭外法律解决方案的放大。特别是在普通法院的权限不明确的情况下，更灵活的仲裁本应该是解决冲突的最简单的方式。这是为了检查拿骚-萨尔布吕肯在调整战略方面是否受到选举人帕拉蒂纳(在那里可以找到类似的文件)的影响。由于定期条款并咨询Einungsverträge和Landfreeden，从13世纪开始，15世纪仲裁庭的制度化进程应该得到证明。此外，还有可能对关于世俗领域仲裁庭起源的讨论作出贡献--罗马--假定是规范的或有意义的--法庭。

The project intends to deliver a monography, which analyses the strategies for settling conflicts in the 15th century – compromise and arbitration tribunal – based on the county of Nassau-Saarbrücken, furthermore discusses the relative conflicts in their imperial bearings and examines the personal engaged in the out-of-court legal settlements concerning their legal education and their courtly connection. A procedural reconstruction of compromises and arbitration tribunals regarding the documents, which define the multistage processes (rachtung/anlass/kompromisz), the correspondence relating to the contentious points including evidence (forderungen, antworten, widerreden and nachreden) and the deeds (entscheidt/spruch/kompromiss) is the central intent. The systematic terms in the rich sources for compromises (fruntlich/mynne/gutlich) and arbitration tribunals (mynne und recht/frundliches resp. gutliches recht/gewillkurter prozess) allow the separation of these legal instruments. The most important documents shall be edited in printed and digital form because, besides general further usability (in the regional history, the officialise or the regional language analysis), they are supposed to be re-used in a project of the chair for Digital Humanities and the Centre of Digital Humanities at the Göttingen University.Following working assumptions are becoming apparent: (1) The feud was the first of three steps for settling conflicts over manorial claims, secondly a comparison was tried during a conference and finally open questions were directed to an arbitration tribunal. Such, a modus operandi of aggression, comparison and arbitrational tribunal for settling legal disputes would be evident. (2) The manorial fragmentation of the Westrich and the many inter-territorial conflicts could have been amplifiers of the frequent out-of-court legal settlements in Nassau-Saarbrücken. Especially when competences of ordinary courts weren’t clear, the more flexible arbitrations should have been the easiest way for settling conflicts. It is to examine, if Nassau-Saarbrücken was influenced by the Electoral Palatinate (where similar documents are to be found) regarding their strategies for adjustments.Due to the regular terms and consulting the Einungsverträge and Landfrieden, an advancing institutionalization of arbitration tribunals in the 15th century, which began in the 13th century, ought to be proved. Also a contribution to the discussion about the origins of arbitrational tribunals in the secular realm – roman-canonical or dingenossenschaftliches Recht are assumed – is possible.