Living in a listed building: Conservation and design of 20th century housing concepts and estates

研究项目“居住在被列入名单的建筑物”有助于从根本上理解不同行为者对被列入名单的20世纪住宅建筑、群体和住区及其固有的住房概念的(互惠)评估和欣赏过程。从遗产保护和住房参与和识别研究的角度，系统地审查了住宅物业、社区以及它们在使用和护理以及保护和设计方面的获取和参与。该项目调查了以下问题：1.居住社区对20世纪的住宅概念或地产赋予了哪些价值，这些(有形和无形的)价值如何与机构保护和公共利益的价值进行谈判并联系起来？2.在20世纪住宅地产的保护、维护和改造中使用了什么概念、工具和干预措施，它们如何在整合不同的利益相关者和动态规划过程方面发挥作用？3.参与如何在获取和活着的遗产方面发挥作用，特别是考虑到社区建设和识别过程？通过对20世纪初至80年代初德国16个列出的住宅区的实证研究，将获得对这些研究问题的见解，这些住宅区实施了具有建筑、城市规划或社会政治意义的住房概念。这些分析是从文物保护和房屋研究的角度进行的。这些发现通过关于士绅化、社会不平等和可持续性的主要辩论的各个方面进行了背景分析。将做出方法论上的贡献，并以教学形式进行测试。这是为了在承认多元价值保护方面进一步发展遗产保护文书，并加强利益攸关方在动态规划进程中的整合。

The research project “Living in a Listed Building” contributes to a fundamental understanding of the (reciprocal) processes of evaluation and appreciation among different actors in relation to listed 20th century residential buildings, ensembles, and settlements and their inherent housing concepts. Residential properties, communities—and their access and participation in use and care, and in conservation and design—are systematically examined from the perspectives of both heritage conservation and housing research on participation and identification. The project investigates the following questions: 1. Which values do residential communities assign to 'their' 20th century housing concept or estate, and how can these (tangible and intangible) values be negotiated and connected with those of institutional conservation and public interest? 2. What concepts, instruments and interventions are used in the preservation, maintenance and alteration of 20th century housing estates, and how do they function in terms of integrating diverse stakeholders and dynamic planning processes? 3. How does participation function regarding access and living heritage, with special consideration of community-building and identification processes? Insights into these research questions will be gained through the empirical study of 16 listed housing estates in German, dating from the turn of the 20th century to the early 1980s, that implemented housing concepts of architectural, urban planning or socio-political significance. The analyses are conducted from the perspectives of heritage conservation and housing research. The findings are contextualised via aspects of the major debates on gentrification, social inequality and sustainability. A methodological contribution will be made and tested in a teaching format. This is intended to further develop heritage conservation instruments with regard to acknowledging value-plural conservation and to strengthen stakeholder-integration in dynamic planning processes.