ヴィクトリア法文化の比較史的考察-19世紀後半期「近代法学」の実相と変容の研究

本研究的目的是将19世纪末的欧洲法学放在当代文化史的大背景下进行恰当的定位。在三年的研究基础上，我写了五篇关于现代法学主要问题的论文。我将继续就这一主题撰写更多的论文，并对它们进行总结，以描绘法学的文化背景。在这里，我将评论前三篇文章：在我的第一篇关于抵抗权的文章中，我首先检验了以前的理论。得出前人对抗诉案件缺乏恰当的类型学研究的结论，笔者建议以自己的方式区分抗诉案件的实证法要件和自然法要件。第二部分是法律中的拟制问题。在这篇文章中，我首先考察了19世纪德国法学中关于拟制的讨论。在此基础上，对小说在欧洲文化史上的地位进行了界定。第三篇为“政治、法律、道德的关系”。基于卡特·施密特关于“政治”概念的理论，我考察了Tripos的根本区别。关于法律与道德、政治与道德关系的论著很多，但对法律与道德、政治与道德之间的基本关系的论述还不够深入。

The aim of this research is to properly place the European legal science of the late 19th century in the context of the contemporary cultural history. Based on my three years' research, I have written five essays concerning the main problems of the modern legal science. I shall continue to write further essays on the subject and summarize them to portrait the cultural background of legal science. Here I'll comment on the first three essays :In my first essay on the right of resistance, I have first examined the previous theories. Arriving at the conclusion that the past researches lack the proper typology of the resistance-cases, I proposed to distinguish among others the positive law elements and the natural law elements on the subject in my own way.The second essay is on the fiction in law. In this essay I first examined the discussion on fiction in legal science of the 19th century Germany. I then tried to define the roll of fiction in the cultural history in Europe.The third essay is on the relation between Politics, Law and Moral. Based on the Cart Schmitt's theory of the concept of "the political", I examined the fundamental difference of the tripos. There are many works on the relation between Law and Moral, and Politics and Moral, but the description of the fundamental relation between the tripos has not been done so thoroughly as it is in my essay.