COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL STUDIES ON CIVIC SAFETY BUILDING

在研究期间(3年)，研究会每年召开两次，共六次，为期两天，过夜。每个研究人员都做了一个研究报告，所有参与者都对他们进行了评论和讨论。因此，我们发现以下四个要点。(1)我们可以看到最近被调查的国家普遍倾向于国家权力干预公民社会，并在“安全”建设方面限制长期保障的公民自由。(2)由于“安全”建设有其特定的历史和文化背景，各国在发展“安全”建设的法律方面走着不同的道路。(3)美国的宪政框架发生了很大的转变，特别是在“9.11”恐怖袭击的影响下，英国的反恐怖主义法在原则上没有改变，因为它已经制定了反对爱尔兰共和军的法律；在上述一般理论的基础上，研究会议讨论了以下主题：“安全”建设与公民自由之间的两难困境，家庭和社区作为“安全”建设的场所的重生，全球变革下的安全观念的变化等。“11.参考资料”)。首席调查员将编辑一本研究书籍，将这些文章收集成5章(1.一般理论，2.关于‘安全’的宪法理论，3.关于‘安全’的比较宪法研究，4.关于‘安全’的法律理论，5.公民安全建设的视角)并出版IT。

DURING THE STUDY PERIOD (3 YEARS), RESEARCH MEETING HAS BEEN HELD EACH YEAR TWO TIMES, TOTALLY SIX TIMES, WHICH RAN TWO DAYS WITH OVERNIGHT STAY. EVERY INVESTIGATOR HAS MADE A RESEARCH PRESENTATION, AND ALL PARTICIPANTS COMMENTED THEM AND DISCUSSED. AS A RESULT, WE FIND OUT FOLLOWING FOUR IMPORTANT POINTS.(1) WE CAN SEE COMMON TENDENCY AMONG THE INVESTIGATED COUNTRIES THAT RECENTLY STATE POWERS INTERVENE IN THE CIVIL SOCIETY AND RESTRAIN CIVIL LIBERTIES GUARANTEED FOR A LONG TIME IN TERMS OF 'SECURITY' BUILDING.(2) NEVERTHELESS EACH COUNTRY GOES ON SOMEHOW DIFFERENT WAY IN DEVELOPING LAW OF 'SECURITY' BUILDING, BECAUSE IT HAS OWN PROPER HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL BACKGROUND.(3) FOR INSTANCE, WHILE IN USA THERE IS SO BIG CONVERSION THAT FRAME OF CONSTITUTIONALISM HAS BEEN CHANGING ESPECIALLY UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF THE 'TERROR ATTACK OF 9.11', IN UK ANTI-TERRORISM LAW HAS NOT BEEN CHANGED IN PRINCIPLE, BECAUSE IT HAD ALREADY MADE UP LAW AGAINST IRA; ALSO GERMANY, WHICH TAKES SYSTEM OF 'FIGHTING DEMOCRACY (STREITBARE DEMOKRATIE)', BALANCES FREEDOM AND SECURITY UNDER PREVIOUS LAW SYSTEM.(4) BASED ON ABOVE GENERAL THEORY, THE RESEARCH MEETING DEALT WITH FOLLOWING THEMES: DILEMMA BETWEEN 'SECURITY' BUILDING AND CIVIL LIBERTIES, REBIRTH OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY AS A PLACE OF 'SECURITY' BUILDING, CHANGE OF CONCEPT OF SECURITY UNDER THE GLOBAL TRANSFORMATION ETC.INVESTIGATORS HAVE WRITTEN RESEARCH ARTICLES ON THEMES STUDIED IN 3 YEARS AND PUBLISHED THEM (CF. "11. REFERENCES"). THE HEAD INVESTIGATOR WILL EDIT A RESEARCH BOOK GATHERING THESE ARTICLES INTO 5 CHAPTERS (1. GENERAL THEORY, 2. CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY ON 'SECURITY', 3. COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL STUDIES ON 'SECURITY', 4. LEGAL THEORIES ON 'SECURITY', 5. PERSPECTIVE OF CIVIC SAFETY BUILDING) AND PUBLISH IT.