Does an ancient circadian clock control transcriptional rhythms using a non-transcriptional oscillator?

我们建议解开一个新发现的生物钟，它被所有形式的生命共享。人类的睡眠-觉醒周期是最常见的24小时节律，但事实上，几乎所有活着的有机体都存在这种“昼夜节律”。驱动这些节律的生物钟在所有生物体中都有非常相似的特性。在动物、苍蝇、真菌、植物、古生菌和蓝藻中，它在人工恒定的环境中继续产生持续时间接近24小时的节律，并且在不同温度下其节律在持续时间上异常稳定。大约自1995年以来，世界各地的实验室都发现，所有这些生物体的发条机制都涉及基因调控网络。几个关键的“时钟基因”通过有节奏地关闭彼此的表达，形成一个计时循环。令人惊讶的是，这些明显相似的生物钟依赖于每组生物体中截然不同的基因。生物学上的常态是，行为相似的生理过程也有相似的机制，都是从一个共同的祖先那里遗传来的。时钟似乎有几个不同的起源，通过趋同进化获得了相似的行为。2005年，在蓝藻中发现了一种非遗传计时器，强化了这一观点。KAI振荡器有节奏地用磷酸盐分子装饰一大块蛋白质，然后将它们移除。这似乎也是进化的一块特殊之处。其他生物体的基因电路时钟通常包括一些由蛋白质磷酸化控制的基因，但它们的基因组缺乏蓝藻所需的KAI成分。我们最近的结果表明，这种范式在两个方面是错误的。在藻类和人类细胞中，时钟机制至少有一部分不依赖于基因调控，而且时钟的这一非转录部分似乎在所有生物体中都是共享的。它的详细机制尚不清楚，我们建议在本项目中对其进行研究。首先，我们将跟进我们最近通过测试藻类中特定药物的效果而发现的线索，因为这些药物对细胞的生化有已知的影响。其次，我们将使用我们最近实施的一种技术方法来并行监测数百个蛋白质磷酸化事件，以找出在基因调控受阻时仍然保持节律的任何事件。它们要么代表非转录时钟的一部分，要么代表它控制的其他蛋白质(就像机械钟的“指针”)。在简单的藻类中，这部分工作会更快、更容易，因为它的蛋白质类型更少，而且我们已经找到了分别研究时钟每一部分的方法。我们将回顾大约30亿年的进化，以找到这个最早的时钟机制。我们会问，今天它的节奏仍然控制着哪些过程。我们希望找出为什么这些基因如此重要，以至于非转录时钟一直保存到现在。同样重要的是要找出非转录时钟如何对研究人员迄今研究的节奏进行计时，如基因节奏和睡眠-觉醒周期。除非我们知道是什么驱动了非转录时钟，否则很难做到这一点，但这个项目应该会提供我们所需的工具。当然，然后我们将测试我们在藻类上的结果是否也适用于其他生物体，以表明这个古老的时钟是否仍然为所有生物学中的细胞的生命计时。如果是这样的话，这种原始的细胞计时器可能会成为未来睡眠障碍治疗的关键，有助于其他藻类在阳光普照时产生生物燃料，以及未来在不可预测的气候下在可预测的时间开花的作物的关键。

We propose to unwind a newly-discovered biological clock, that is shared by all forms of Life. The human sleep-wake cycle is the most familiar 24-hour rhythm, but in fact such 'circadian rhythms' are found in almost all living organisms. The circadian clock, which drives these rhythms, shares very similar properties in all organisms. In animals, flies, fungi, plants, archaea and cyanobacteria, it continues to generate rhythms close to 24h in duration in artificially constant environments, and its rhythms are unusually stable in duration at different temperatures. Since roughly 1995, laboratories across the world have found that the clockwork mechanism of all these organisms involves networks of gene regulation. A few key "clock genes" form a timing loop by rhythmically turning off each other's expression. Surprisingly, these overtly similar clocks depend on quite different genes in each group of organisms. The norm in biology has been that physiological processes that behave alike also share similar mechanisms, all inherited from a common ancestor. Clocks appeared to have several different origins, that gained similar behaviour through convergent evolution. This notion was reinforced when, in 2005, a non-genetic timer was discovered in cyanobacteria. The Kai oscillator rhythmically decorated a large protein with phosphate molecules, then removed them. This too seemed an idiosyncratic piece of evolution. The gene-circuit clocks in other organisms often included some control by protein phosphorylation, but their genomes lacked the Kai components that were required in cyanobacteria.Our recent results suggest that this paradigm is wrong on two counts. At least part of the clock mechanism in an alga and in human cells does not depend on gene regulation, and this 'non-transcriptional' part of the clock appears to be shared across all organisms. Its detailed mechanism is unknown, and we propose to study it in this project. Firstly, we will follow up leads that we have recently uncovered by testing the effects of specific drugs in the alga, because the drugs have known effects on the cell's biochemistry. Secondly, we will use a technological method that we recently implemented to monitor hundreds of protein phosphorylation events in parallel, in order to find any that still remain rhythmic when gene regulation is blocked. These will represent either parts of the non-transcriptional clock, or other proteins that it controls (like the 'hands' of a mechanical clock). This part of the work will be faster and easier in the simple alga, because it has fewer protein types, and because we have found ways to study each part of the clock separately.We will be looking back about 3 billion years in evolution, to find this earliest clock mechanism. We will ask which processes its rhythms still control today. We hope to find out why these were so important that the non-transcriptional clock has been preserved to the present. It is also important to find out how the non-transcriptional clock contributes to timing the rhythms that researchers have studied up to now, like the gene rhythms and the sleep-wake cycle. Until we know what drives the non-transcriptional clock, it will be difficult to do so, but this project should provide the tools we need. Of course, we will then test whether our results in the alga also hold in other organisms, to show whether this ancient clock still times the lives of cells in all of Biology. If so, then this original cellular timer could hold the key to future treatments for sleep disorders, to helping other algae produce biofuel while the sun shines, and to future crops that flower at predictable times in an unpredictable climate.