权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Collaborative Research: Further Strengthening Qualitative Research Through Methodological Innovation and Integration: Media Coverage of Social Movements

合作研究：通过方法创新和整合进一步加强定性研究：媒体对社会运动的报道

基本信息

批准号：
1657872
负责人：
Edwin Amenta
金额：
$ 21.36万
依托单位：
University of California-Irvine
依托单位国家：
美国
项目类别：
Continuing Grant
财政年份：
2017
资助国家：
美国
起止时间：
2017-05-01 至 2021-04-30
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1657872&HistoricalAwards=false
关键词：
Collaborative Research Further Strengthening Qualitative

项目摘要

To understand social movements and the politics of the disadvantaged one needs to understand the media coverage of social movement and political advocacy organizations. These organizations provide critical resources to seek social change, help construct political identities, and spur civic engagement. The attention of the mass news media is critical to these organizations. News coverage shows that these organizations are being treated as legitimate spokespersons and helps them influence public opinion and policy agendas. This project augments a previous collection of approximately one million articles published in the twentieth century in four national newspapers--the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, and Los Angeles Times. This project will capture data in all 18 newspapers available through ProQuest Historical Newspapers, including a wealth of regional and African-American newspapers, and will extend these data through the first 15 years of this century. The project will also gather more extensive information about the articles, coverage data on major interest groups, and organizational data on the advocacy and movement organizations in the sample. These data will be supplemented with television news and social media data. In addition to creating this valuable data set, the key merits of the project include the addressing of several research questions regarding the causes of the amount and quality of coverage of movements and their organizations. The project will also result in the training of graduate students and produce several scholarly articles that identify and explain movement coverage and its consequences, and a scholarly monograph. The project addresses several key empirical and "why" questions about these organizations? news coverage: Which organizations and allied movements have received the greatest newspaper and TV coverage? Which organizations have received the greatest attention in their movements? How has the coverage changed over time and across movements? Are coverage patterns similar across national, regional, and African-American newspapers? Do movements usually gain substantive coverage in articles in which they are mentioned? What accounts for extensive newspaper coverage of a movement and its activities? What accounts for extensive newspaper coverage for individual organizations within a movement? Are the patterns of coverage consistent with the main theories of social movements?resource mobilization, new social movement, grievance, and political process and political reform theories? How has the connection between newspaper coverage and movement activity changed with the decline of newspapers and the rise of the Internet and social media? Under which conditions do movement actors receive substantive news coverage? The project will address these questions by synthesizing negative binomial regression analyses on counts data and qualitative methods, notably fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analyses and comparative historical analyses. The analyses combine big-data gathering with qualitative coding of newspapers. Unlike most large-N work, the project can return to the original data, the newspaper articles, to refine hypotheses and build theory.

要了解社会运动和弱势群体的政治，需要了解社会运动和政治倡导组织的媒体报道。这些组织为寻求社会变革、帮助构建政治身份和刺激公民参与提供了关键资源。大众新闻媒体的关注对这些组织至关重要。新闻报道显示，这些组织被视为合法发言人，并帮助他们影响公众舆论和政策议程。该项目丰富了之前在 20 世纪四家全国性报纸（《纽约时报》、《华盛顿邮报》、《华尔街日报》和《洛杉矶时报》）上发表的约 100 万篇文章的内容。该项目将采集通过 ProQuest Historical Newspapers 提供的所有 18 种报纸的数据，包括大量的地区和非裔美国报纸，并将这些数据扩展到本世纪的前 15 年。该项目还将收集有关文章的更广泛的信息、主要利益团体的覆盖数据以及样本中倡导和运动组织的组织数据。这些数据将得到电视新闻和社交媒体数据的补充。除了创建这个有价值的数据集之外，该项目的主要优点还包括解决有关运动及其组织的报道数量和质量的原因的几个研究问题。该项目还将对研究生进行培训，并撰写几篇识别和解释运动报道及其后果的学术文章，以及一本学术专着。该项目解决了有关这些组织的几个关键的实证问题和“为什么”问题？新闻报道：哪些组织和联盟运动得到了最多的报纸和电视报道？哪些组织的活动最受关注？覆盖范围随着时间和运动的变化如何变化？国家、地区和非裔美国报纸的报道模式是否相似？提及运动的文章通常会获得实质性报道吗？报纸对一场运动及其活动进行广泛报道的原因是什么？是什么导致报纸对运动中的各个组织进行广泛报道？报道模式是否与社会运动的主要理论——资源动员、新社会运动、不满、政治进程和政治改革理论一致？随着报纸的衰落和互联网和社交媒体的兴起，报纸报道和运动活动之间的联系发生了怎样的变化？在什么条件下运动参与者会收到实质性的新闻报道？该项目将通过综合计数数据的负二项式回归分析和定性方法，特别是模糊集定性比较分析和比较历史分析来解决这些问题。这些分析将大数据收集与报纸的定性编码结合起来。与大多数大N工作不同，该项目可以返回原始数据、报纸文章，以完善假设并建立理论。

项目成果

期刊论文数量（5）

专著数量（0）

科研奖励数量（0）

会议论文数量（0）

专利数量（0）

All the Right Movements? Mediation, Rightist Movements, and Why US Movements Received Extensive Newspaper Coverage

所有正确的动作？

DOI：
10.1093/sf/sox067
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
Social Forces
影响因子：
4.8
作者：
Amenta, Edwin;Alan Elliott, Thomas
通讯作者：
Alan Elliott, Thomas

What Drives Progressive Policy? Institutional Politics, Political Mediation, Policy Feedbacks, and Early U.S. Old‐Age Policy

是什么推动了进步政策？

DOI：
10.1111/socf.12514
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
Sociological Forum
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Amenta, Edwin;Elliott, Thomas Alan
通讯作者：
Elliott, Thomas Alan

From bias to coverage: What explains how news organizations treat social movements

从偏见到报道：如何解释新闻机构如何对待社会运动

DOI：
10.1111/soc4.12460
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
Sociology Compass
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Amenta, Edwin;Elliott, Thomas Alan;Shortt, Nicole;Tierney, Amber Celina;Türkoğlu, Didem;Vann, Burrel
通讯作者：
Vann, Burrel

MAKING GOOD NEWS: WHAT EXPLAINS THE QUALITY OF COVERAGE OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT*

传播好消息：如何解释民权运动的报道质量*

DOI：
10.17813/1086-671x-24-1-19
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
Mobilization: An International Quarterly
影响因子：
0
作者：
Amenta, Edwin;Elliott, Thomas Alan;Shortt, Nicole;Tierney, Amber C.;Türkoğlu, Didem;Vann, Burrel
通讯作者：
Vann, Burrel

The Cultural Impacts of Social Movements