Equitable and Effective Teaching in Undergraduate STEM Education: A Framework for Institutions, Educators, and Disciplines

该项目旨在通过提供共同语言和框架来促进和指导在中学后科学，技术，工程和数学（STEM）课程和计划中实施公平有效的教学，从而为国家利益服务。该项目打算编制一份国家科学院报告，概述以证据为基础的教学方法的原则，以促进公平。该报告还计划就如何促进这些方法的实施向机构领导人、系主任和教育工作者个人提供建议。该指南将包括关注提供中学后STEM教育的各种机构类型的需求和限制。该项目计划利用多种形式的证据，考虑所有人口群体的学习经验和多重身份的交叉点，特别是那些没有得到现行做法很好服务的人。该研究旨在将人们如何学习，课堂实践，身份和归属感的相关调查与基于学科的教育研究相结合，这些研究涉及STEM领域的教学，高等教育结构的知识以及系统变革的证据。该项目希望促进对中学后STEM教育中教与学的最新研究的理解，并指导大规模的改进。它将根据美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院的共识研究格式进行。科学教育委员会与高等教育委员会和劳动力委员会合作，将召集一个专家委员会进行共识研究，以：1）制定一个基于证据的框架，以促进本科STEM教育的公平和有效教学，并考虑到不同的教学环境，模式和机构类型;及（2）概述院校及专上课程和学习经验发展者有效推行该架构所需的策略和资源。这项研究计划解决的问题，包括课堂，部门，机构，以及国家和国家政策的系统的各个层面。特别是将探讨有助于采取更公平和有效办法的机构和部门政策和做法，包括与专业发展、奖励和晋升有关的政策和做法。在项目实施过程中，将开展广泛的外联活动，以收集利益攸关方的投入，并建立关系，促进最后报告中建议的想法的接受和实施。此外，报告发布后，将广泛分发，在专业会议上分享，并用于制定行动手册，重点关注项目期间确定的各类机构、模式或其他主题。NSF IUSE：EHR计划支持研究和开发项目，以提高所有学生的STEM教育的有效性。该奖项反映了NSF的法定使命，并通过使用基金会的智力价值和更广泛的影响审查标准进行评估，被认为值得支持。

This project aims to serve the national interest by providing common language and a framework to catalyze and guide implementation of equitable and effective teaching in postsecondary science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses and programs. The project intends produce a National Academies report that outlines principles of evidence-based approaches to teaching that center and promote equity. The report plans to also provide recommendations to institutional leaders, department chairs, and individual educators on how to foster implementation of these approaches. This guidance will include attention to the needs and constraints of the full variety of institution types that provide postsecondary STEM education. The project plans to draw on multiple forms of evidence to consider the learning experiences of all demographic groups and the intersection of multiple identities, especially those who are not well served by current practices. The study intends to integrate related lines of inquiry on how people learn, classroom practices, identity, and belonging with disciplinary based education research on teaching in the STEM fields, knowledge of the structure of higher education, and evidence on system change. The project hopes to advance understanding of the latest research on teaching and learning in postsecondary STEM education and to guide improvements at scale. It will be conducted according to the consensus study format of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The Board on Science Education in collaboration with the Board on Higher Education and the Workforce will convene an expert committee to conduct a consensus study to: 1) develop an evidence-based framework for equitable and effective teaching in undergraduate STEM education that takes into account different teaching contexts, modalities and types of institutions; and, 2) outline the strategies and resources needed for institutions and developers of post-secondary courses and learning experiences to effectively implement the framework. The study plans to address issues ranging across levels of the system that include classroom, department, institutional, as well as state and national policy. In particular institutional and departmental policies and practices that can facilitate adoption of more equitable and effective approaches will be explored, including those related to professional development, incentives, and advancement. During the course of the project, extensive outreach will be carried out to gather input from stakeholders and to cultivate relationships that will foster uptake and implementation of the ideas recommended in the final report. In addition, following its release, the report will be distributed widely, shared at professional conferences, and used to develop playbooks with targeted foci on various types of institutions, modalities, or other themes identified during the project. The NSF IUSE: EHR Program supports research and development projects to improve the effectiveness of STEM education for all students.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.