A comparative study of sandplay-making process between Australian and Japanese

澳大利亚与日本沙盘游戏制作过程的比较研究

• 批准号: 12571006
• 负责人: OKADA Yasunobu
• 金额: $ 4.22万
• 依托单位: KYOTO UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
• 财政年份: 2000
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2000 至 2001
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-12571006/
• 关键词: Sandplay therapy; Sandplay making process; Study on particular cases; Primary students; Secondary students; Videotaped records; Written reports; Australia; 制作プロセス; 体験プロセス; 日豪比較

Sandplay therapy is one of the therapeutic methods in clinical psychology that has been thought effective. Past studies had tended to see sandplay-works as completed products. However this study aimed to collect data, seeking new edges to understand the technique, paying special attention to the sandplay-making process. A comparison was also made between works and processes in Japan and Australia, following a past study by Okada et al. (1988).A research was carried out on primary and secondary students during 2000. In 2001, the collected data was classified through a careful look on each sandplay-work, in terms of the impression it gave, the making process, and subject's inner experience. As a result, there came out four points for deeper consideration, i.e. (1) an examination on the numbers characterizing the sandplay-works ; (2) an attempt to understand the sandplay-works from the impression of each work as a whole ; (3) a search for the links between what sandplay-works the secondary students had made and what they had experienced while making them (that were inferred from their vttitten reports after the research) ; (4) an attempt to graph how sandplay-objects had been placed or removed during the making process (which was videotaped), looking on particular cases.Although it had been hoped to collect data in Australian primary and secondary students, it was not successful. This is probably because of the different consciousness about privacy between the two countries as well as of that the sandplay therapy is scarcely known in Australia. This made it clear that much more consideration was necessary for where to collect data and how to compare them. Furthermore researches were successful in Australia at a university and a school for severely handicapped children on speech. With an emphasis on the making process, cases from each research were considered deeply.

沙盘游戏疗法是临床心理学中被认为有效的治疗方法之一。过去的研究倾向于将沙盘游戏作品视为完整的产品。然而，这项研究的目的是收集数据，寻找新的边缘来理解该技术，并特别关注沙盘游戏的制作过程。根据 Okada 等人过去的研究，还对日本和澳大利亚的工作和流程进行了比较。 (1988)。2000年对中小学生进行了一项研究。2001年，通过对每个沙盘作品的印象、制作过程和受试者的内心体验进行仔细观察，对收集到的数据进行分类。由此，提出四点值得深入思考：（1）沙盘作品特征数字的考察； (2)尝试从对每部作品的整体印象来理解沙盘作品； (3) 寻找中学生制作的沙盘作品与他们制作沙盘作品时的经历之间的联系（从研究后的vttitten报告中推断出来）； （4）尝试以图表形式记录沙盘在制作过程中如何放置或移除（并进行录像），并查看具体案例。虽然曾希望收集澳大利亚中小学生的数据，但没有成功。这可能是因为两国对于隐私的意识不同，以及沙盘游戏疗法在澳大利亚鲜为人知。这清楚地表明，有必要更多地考虑在哪里收集数据以及如何比较它们。此外，澳大利亚一所大学和一所针对严重言语障碍儿童的学校的研究也取得了成功。注重制作过程，对每项研究的案例都进行了深入考虑。