A comparative study of sandplay-making process between Australian and Japanese

澳大利亚与日本沙盘游戏制作过程的比较研究

• 批准号: 12571006
• 负责人: OKADA Yasunobu
• 金额: $ 4.22万
• 依托单位: KYOTO UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
• 财政年份: 2000
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2000 至 2001
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-12571006/
• 关键词: Sandplay therapy; Sandplay making process; Study on particular cases; Primary students; Secondary students; Videotaped records; Written reports; Australia; 制作プロセス; 体験プロセス; 日豪比較

Sandplay therapy is one of the therapeutic methods in clinical psychology that has been thought effective. Past studies had tended to see sandplay-works as completed products. However this study aimed to collect data, seeking new edges to understand the technique, paying special attention to the sandplay-making process. A comparison was also made between works and processes in Japan and Australia, following a past study by Okada et al. (1988).A research was carried out on primary and secondary students during 2000. In 2001, the collected data was classified through a careful look on each sandplay-work, in terms of the impression it gave, the making process, and subject's inner experience. As a result, there came out four points for deeper consideration, i.e. (1) an examination on the numbers characterizing the sandplay-works ; (2) an attempt to understand the sandplay-works from the impression of each work as a whole ; (3) a search for the links between what sandplay-works the secondary students had made and what they had experienced while making them (that were inferred from their vttitten reports after the research) ; (4) an attempt to graph how sandplay-objects had been placed or removed during the making process (which was videotaped), looking on particular cases.Although it had been hoped to collect data in Australian primary and secondary students, it was not successful. This is probably because of the different consciousness about privacy between the two countries as well as of that the sandplay therapy is scarcely known in Australia. This made it clear that much more consideration was necessary for where to collect data and how to compare them. Furthermore researches were successful in Australia at a university and a school for severely handicapped children on speech. With an emphasis on the making process, cases from each research were considered deeply.

Sandplay疗法是被认为有效的临床心理学治疗方法之一。过去的研究倾向于将Sandplay-Works视为已完成的产品。但是，这项研究旨在收集数据，寻求新的边缘以了解该技术，并特别注意沙子制造过程。在Okada等人过去的研究之后，日本和澳大利亚的作品和过程之间也进行了比较。 （1988年）。在2000年对小学和中学生进行了一项研究。在2001年，就其给人的印象，制作过程和受试者的内在经验而言，通过对每个砂纸的仔细看待收集的数据进行了分类。结果，提出了四个点供更深入的考虑，即（1）对表征Sandplay-works的数字进行检查； （2）试图从整个工作的印象中理解砂纸工作； （3）搜索二级学生所做的砂玩法与他们在制作它们时所经历的经历之间的联系（从研究后从他们的VTTITTER报告中推断出来）； （4）试图在制作过程中（录像），在特定情况下绘制如何放置或删除SandPlay-Objects。这可能是因为对两国之间的隐私以及在澳大利亚几乎不知所措的人之间的隐私意识不同。这清楚地表明，要收集数据以及如何比较数据是必要的。此外，研究在澳大利亚的一所大学和一所言语严重残障儿童的学校都取得了成功。在重点是制作过程中，深切考虑了每项研究的病例。