Cultural Policies, Heritage Industry and Folklorism : Revitalizing local areas and folk cultures

作为整个总结，以下三点是我对日本的文化政策、遗产产业和民俗的新的了解。首先，我们认为绿色旅游取代了家乡文化观光，从不同的角度与生态旅游没有关系。绿色旅游不同于生态旅游的保护运动思想，它完全是由观光发展的经济逻辑引起的。其次，当我们看到很多文物观光时，我们意识到它只限于一些人拉这些，而且有地区和当地居民没有铁一般的团结。一些人是试图融入该地区的政府，一些新的地区监督阶层，如地区政客和地区金融家，一些当地商人，如装载业和纪念品商店，经济上滋润于观光，以及外来者，如旅行社，顾问公司和建筑公司。第三，什么时候来分析和描述这部关于民俗生活和民俗的民族志，以观光为目的，通过对必要的文化资源的实际利用，不能不把它作为一种观光现象，把我在第三件事上提供的外化自然，倾向于将它与我准备的民族典范文化结合起来。

As the entire summary, next 3 points are given as the knowledge which I could newly get about cultural policies, heritage industry and folklorism in Japan. First of all, we suppose green tourism substitutes hometown culture sightseeing, was not relation to eco-tourism from different point. Green tourism is unlike eco-tourism from the thought of conservation movement, and it is caused completely by the economic logic of sightseeing development. At second, When we see a lot of heritage sightseeing, we appreciated it is restricted to some persons pulling these, and there are the area and the local resident no ironclad solidarity. The some persons are administrations attempt social integration of the area, new superintendent classes of areas such as the regional politician and the regional financier, some local traders such as the loading business and the souvenir shop who are moistened by sightseeing economically, and the outsiders such as the travel agency, the consultant companies and construction firms. At third, when will analyze and describe this ethnographies about folk life and folklore, By practical use of the cultural resources being necessary makes with the intention of sightseeing it cannot help charged as for a sightseeing phenomenon, turned nature at the outside which I provide at third matters, tendency to join it up with the national model culture which I prepared it is central.