Cultural Policies, Heritage Industry and Folklorism : Revitalizing local areas and folk cultures

作为全文的总结，以下三点是我对日本文化政策、遗产产业和民俗学的新认识。首先，我们假设绿色旅游是对故乡文化观光的替代，从不同的角度与生态旅游没有联系。绿色旅游不同于自然保护运动思想中的生态旅游，它完全是由观光旅游发展的经济逻辑所导致的。第二，当我们看到很多遗产观光，我们欣赏它是限制在一些人拉这些，并有该地区和当地居民没有铁的团结。这部分人是试图进行区域社会整合的行政部门，区域政治家和区域金融家等区域新管理阶层，一些被观光经济所滋润的当地商人，如装卸业和纪念品商店，以及旅行社、咨询公司和建筑公司等外来者。第三，在分析和描述这本关于民间生活和民俗的民族志时，通过对文化资源的实际利用是必要的，使其与观光的意图不能不被指控为一种观光现象，在我提供的第三件事之外，把它与我准备的国家示范文化结合起来的趋势是中心。

As the entire summary, next 3 points are given as the knowledge which I could newly get about cultural policies, heritage industry and folklorism in Japan. First of all, we suppose green tourism substitutes hometown culture sightseeing, was not relation to eco-tourism from different point. Green tourism is unlike eco-tourism from the thought of conservation movement, and it is caused completely by the economic logic of sightseeing development. At second, When we see a lot of heritage sightseeing, we appreciated it is restricted to some persons pulling these, and there are the area and the local resident no ironclad solidarity. The some persons are administrations attempt social integration of the area, new superintendent classes of areas such as the regional politician and the regional financier, some local traders such as the loading business and the souvenir shop who are moistened by sightseeing economically, and the outsiders such as the travel agency, the consultant companies and construction firms. At third, when will analyze and describe this ethnographies about folk life and folklore, By practical use of the cultural resources being necessary makes with the intention of sightseeing it cannot help charged as for a sightseeing phenomenon, turned nature at the outside which I provide at third matters, tendency to join it up with the national model culture which I prepared it is central.