Cultural Policies, Heritage Industry and Folklorism : Revitalizing local areas and folk cultures

作为整个总结，以下三点是我对日本文化政策、遗产产业和民俗学的新认识。首先，我们假设绿色旅游替代了乡土文化观光，从不同的角度与生态旅游没有关系。绿色旅游不同于自然保护运动思想上的生态旅游，它完全是由观光开发的经济逻辑造成的。其次，当我们看到很多遗产观光时，我们意识到它仅限于一些人拉这些，并没有地区和当地居民的坚不可摧的团结。一些人是试图实现地区社会一体化的行政部门、地区政治家和地区金融家等地区新管理者阶层、因观光经济而受益的装货业和纪念品商店等当地商人以及旅行社、咨询公司和建筑公司等外来者。第三，本文将对这一关于民间生活和民俗的民族志进行分析和描述，通过对必要的文化资源的实际利用，使其以观光为目的而不由自主地作为一种观光现象，将我所提供的外在的自然，倾向于将其与我所准备的民族模式文化联系起来。

As the entire summary, next 3 points are given as the knowledge which I could newly get about cultural policies, heritage industry and folklorism in Japan. First of all, we suppose green tourism substitutes hometown culture sightseeing, was not relation to eco-tourism from different point. Green tourism is unlike eco-tourism from the thought of conservation movement, and it is caused completely by the economic logic of sightseeing development. At second, When we see a lot of heritage sightseeing, we appreciated it is restricted to some persons pulling these, and there are the area and the local resident no ironclad solidarity. The some persons are administrations attempt social integration of the area, new superintendent classes of areas such as the regional politician and the regional financier, some local traders such as the loading business and the souvenir shop who are moistened by sightseeing economically, and the outsiders such as the travel agency, the consultant companies and construction firms. At third, when will analyze and describe this ethnographies about folk life and folklore, By practical use of the cultural resources being necessary makes with the intention of sightseeing it cannot help charged as for a sightseeing phenomenon, turned nature at the outside which I provide at third matters, tendency to join it up with the national model culture which I prepared it is central.