The publication of the first edition of the "Communist Manifesto" and its effective history

从这项研究中，我们得出了以下结论。23页的小册子、30页的小册子和赫希菲尔德版，这三本小册子至少曾经被认为是《共产党宣言》的第一版。在这三本小册子中，前两本很有可能是《共产党宣言》的第一版。在该版本出版后，它的文本在周报《德意志伦敦人报》（DLZ）上连载。在连载的基础上对两本小册子的文本进行了批判，我们比以前的研究人员更准确地推测，这23页的小册子只不过是“CM”的第一版。我们重新检查了23页版本的每个印象，并比之前的研究更准确地推测，“CM”的第一印象是这个印刷错误的页码为23而不是17.3的特定版本。在这本23页的小册子中，有一个印痕被伯特·安德烈亚斯归类为1D。只有它的复制品仍然存在。我们查看了他们的历史，如果真的出现过的话，我们就推测这个印象是在何时何地印出来的。我们在东京庆应义塾大学的三田媒体中心找到了这本23页的小册子。根据库琴斯基对印象的编号，我们确定它是B4-6。调查“NachlaiβJ。L. Schabelitz和“Brunswick女士”，我们阐明了“DLZ”中有关的人与共产主义者同盟成员和德国工人教育协会成员的关系，他们出版了“CM”。关于赫希菲尔德版在日本的有效历史，我们发表了一篇文章《《共产党宣言》在日本的翻译及其有效历史》。

We reached the following conclusions from this research.1. Three brcchures, the 23-page booklet, the 30-page one and the Hirschfeld edition, have been regarded as the first edition of the "Manifesto of the Communist Party" at least once before. Of these three booklets, the former two have a strong possibility of being the first version of the "Communist Manifesto (CM)." Right after the version was published, its text was serialized in the weekly newspaper, the "Deutsche Londoner Zeitung (DLZ)." Criticizing both texts of the two booklets on the basis of the serialization, we Presumed more accurately than previous researchers that the 23-page brochure is nothing but the first edition of the "CM."2. We re-exa mined each of impressions of the 23-page edition, and presumed more precisely than prior research that the first impression of the "CM" is this particular version with a misprinted page number of 23 instead of 17.3. One of the impressions of the 23-page booklet was classified as 1D by Bert Andreas. Only its reproductions are still in existence. We sur/eyed their history and supposed when and where the impression was printed if it really appeared.4. We traced the whereabouts of the 23-page brochure in Japan to the Mita Media Center at Keio University in Tokyo. We identified it as B4-6 according to Kuczynski's numbering of the impressions.5. Investigating "NachlaiβJ. L. Schabelitz" and "Ms. Brunswick," we elucidated the relationship of the people concerned in the "DLZ" to the members of Communist League and those of the German Worker's Educational Society, who published the "CM."6. In connection with the effective history of the Hirschfeld edition in Japan, we published an article, 'The translations of the "Communist Manifesto" in Japan and their effective history.'