Administration of Justice: IInd Franco-Japanese Legal Joint Studies.

1.本研究的目的是对法日两国基于民族心理的司法管理进行比较分析。通过1986年和1988年10月举行的第2次D2、D4日法日司法研讨会的日本研究者的合作研究，可以较好地实现这一目的。它的后果现在正在整理通过专题讨论会报告在著名的杂志命名为“JURISR”，并将很快从YUHIKAKU出版。2. (1)在民商法分科中，我们可以确认和解在日本冲突解决制度中发挥重要作用的原因。在法国，法律的争议必须在原告和被告面前进行裁决的原则得到严格遵守，而在日本，相反，双方都不喜欢与对方发生冲突。(2)在劳动法分工中，观念的差异主要表现为：（1）观念的差异;在日本，劳资双方的代表不能为了共同的利益而进行谈判，而只能以片面的观点进行谈判。这种情况在法国是不可能发生的。(3)在宪法与行政法的划分中，法官在涉及政治问题的纠纷中的角色问题，无论在法国还是在日本，都是一个有争议的问题。对法院不得拒绝判决原则的理解和司法审查制度的差异可能与此问题有关。

1. The purpose of this reserch is the franco-japanese comparative analysis of the administration of jusice besed on the mentality of nationalities, and could be fairly achieved through co-operative reserch of japanese investigators from 1986 and 2<@D1eme@>D2 journe<@D4,@>D4e juridiques franco-japonaises held in October 1988. Its consequences is now putting into order through the symposia reported in the famous journal named "JURISR" and will be soon published from YUHIKAKU.2.(1) In civil and commercial law division, we could confirm the reason why the conciliation can play the important role in japanese conflicts-resolution system. In France, the principle that the legal dispute must be judged in front of both plaintif and defendant is strictly obseved, but in japan, to the contrary, both parties dislike the encounter with the other. (2) In labor law division, the difference of mentality is appeared in the different way as (1). In Japan, the representatived of labor and management can nogotiate for the common good, not only with the one-sided view. This circonstance cannot be acquired in France. (3) In constitutional and administartive law division, the role of judges in the dispute relationg to the political question is controversial problem both in France and in Japan. The appreciation of the principle that the court cannot refuse the judgement and the difference of the system of judicial review may relate this problem.