Administration of Justice: IInd Franco-Japanese Legal Joint Studies.

司法行政：第二次法日法律联合研究。

• 批准号: 61301059
• 负责人: KITAMURA Ichiro
• 金额: $ 2.18万
• 依托单位: University of Tokyo
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Co-operative Research (A)
• 财政年份: 1986
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1986 至 1988
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-61301059/
• 关键词: Conciliation; Meditation; Political question; French law; Resolution of conflicts; 紛争決定; フランス法; 裁判; 政策形成訴訟フランスの司法制度; 紛争処理; 憲法訴訟; 行政訴訟; 政策決定

1. The purpose of this reserch is the franco-japanese comparative analysis of the administration of jusice besed on the mentality of nationalities, and could be fairly achieved through co-operative reserch of japanese investigators from 1986 and 2<@D1eme@>D2 journe<@D4,@>D4e juridiques franco-japonaises held in October 1988. Its consequences is now putting into order through the symposia reported in the famous journal named "JURISR" and will be soon published from YUHIKAKU.2.(1) In civil and commercial law division, we could confirm the reason why the conciliation can play the important role in japanese conflicts-resolution system. In France, the principle that the legal dispute must be judged in front of both plaintif and defendant is strictly obseved, but in japan, to the contrary, both parties dislike the encounter with the other. (2) In labor law division, the difference of mentality is appeared in the different way as (1). In Japan, the representatived of labor and management can nogotiate for the common good, not only with the one-sided view. This circonstance cannot be acquired in France. (3) In constitutional and administartive law division, the role of judges in the dispute relationg to the political question is controversial problem both in France and in Japan. The appreciation of the principle that the court cannot refuse the judgement and the difference of the system of judicial review may relate this problem.

1.本研究的目的是在民族心态的基础上对日本司法制度进行法日比较分析，并通过1986年以来的日本调查人员与1988年10月举行的两日法日司法调查人员的合作研究取得较好的效果。调解的后果目前正在通过著名期刊《司法》上报道的座谈会进行整理，并即将在日本民商法分会上发表。(1)在民商法分部中，我们可以确认调解在日本冲突解决体系中发挥重要作用的原因。在法国，法律纠纷必须在原告和被告面前进行审判的原则是严格遵守的，但在日本，相反，双方都不喜欢与对方相遇。(2)在劳动法律分工中，心理上的差异表现为(1)。在日本，劳资双方的代表可以不为共同利益而谈判，而不仅仅是以片面的观点进行谈判。这种常量在法国是得不到的。(3)在宪法和行政法的划分中，法官在涉及政治问题的纠纷中的作用在法国和日本都是一个有争议的问题。对法院不能拒绝判决原则的理解和司法审查制度的差异可能与这一问题有关。

项目成果

Toshio YAMAGUCHI.: "L'importance du reglement a l'amiable(wakai)des conflits du travail au Japon" 1-39 (1988)

Toshio YAMAGUCHI.：“Limportance du reglement a lamiable(wakai)des conflits du travail au Japon”1-39 (1988)

Noburu KOYAMA.: "L'histoire breve du droit de :la conciliation en France(3) ---de la reforme 1935 au Nouveau Code de Procedure civile---" The hokkaigakuen.Law Journal. 22. 453-510 (1987)

Noburu KOYAMA.：“Lhistoire breve du droit de :la conciliation en France(3) ---de la Reforme 1935 au Nouveau Code de Civile---” The hokkaigakuen.Law Journal。

小山昇: 北海道学園大学 法学研究. 22. 41-61 (1986)

小山升：北海道学园大学法学研究。22. 41-61 (1986)

Noburu KOYAMA.: "L'histoire breve du droit de la conciliation en France(2)" The Hokkaigakuen Law Journal. 22. 193-249 (1986)

小山伸：“法国调解权的历史（2）”《北海学院法律杂志》。

Noburu KOYAMA; Ichiro KITAMURA.: La conciliation en matiere civile et commerciale au Japon. 96 (1988)

小山伸；