The Organaizational Transformation of Political Parties under the EU integration

欧盟一体化背景下政党组织转型

• 批准号: 11620086
• 负责人: MURAKAMI Shinichiro
• 金额: $ 1.47万
• 依托单位: Kobe City University of Foreign Studies
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1999
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1999 至 2000
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-11620086/
• 关键词: Political Party; European Union; Mars Organization; Subculture; State Structure; イギリス; イタリア; フランス; ドイツ; ベルギー; オランダ

The fundamental purpose of our joint research is to identify the dimension and scope of the organizational transformation of political parties under the ongoing Euroepan integration. While the sovereignty among member states of the European Union become so increasingly shared that the policy choices available to national governments are getting more restricted, political parties have yet a crucial role in the decision making process of each national government. Political parties also reflect the historical and cultural characteristics of each national society. So we tried to analyze six specific cases ( Italy, Britain, Germany, Netherlands and Belgium) in the comparative perspective.We got the following conclusion. 1) The European integration doesn't directly affect the organizational structures of political parties 2) Political parties basically maintain their own organizations relying on their own historical, institutional and cultural contexts 3) The organizations of political parties have not yet lost their importance in terms of legitimacy and leadership. 4) As showed in the Italian case, the European integration caused drastic organizational transformation of political parities. 5) This exceptional case can be explained by the highly vulnerable structure of the Italian state to external constraints imposed by the European Union.

我们共同研究的根本目的是确定在当前欧洲一体化的情况下政党组织转型的规模和范围。虽然欧盟成员国之间的主权日益共享，各国政府的政策选择越来越受到限制，但政党在各国政府的决策过程中仍发挥着至关重要的作用。政党也反映了每个国家社会的历史和文化特征。因此，我们尝试从比较的角度对六个具体案例（意大利、英国、德国、荷兰和比利时）进行分析，得出以下结论。1)欧洲一体化并没有直接影响到政党的组织结构。2）政党依靠自身的历史、制度和文化背景基本上维持着自己的组织。3）政党组织在合法性和领导力方面的重要性尚未丧失。4)正如意大利的案例所表明的那样，欧洲一体化导致了政治均势的剧烈组织变革。5)这一特殊情况可以解释为意大利国家结构极易受到欧洲联盟施加的外部限制的影响。

项目成果

Shinichiro Murakami: "Where can we put the conservation of Japan? >From the conparetive Studies between Britain an Japan"Rouza. September. 110-117 (2000)

村上信一郎：“日本的保护应该放在哪里？”来自英国与日本的比较研究”Rouza。

阪野 智一: "Sources and Dynamics of Party Changes : Internal Politics in the Social Democratic Parties of Britain and Japan"国際文化学研究(神戸大学国際文化学部). 14. 87-122 (2000)

Tomokazu Sakano：“政党变革的根源和动力：英国和日本社会民主党的内部政治”国际文化研究（神户大学国际文化学院）14. 87-122（2000）。

水島治郎: "戦後オランダの政治構造"東京大学出版会. 275 (2001)

水岛二郎：《战后荷兰的政治结构》东京大学出版社 275 (2001)。

村上 信一郎: "The Northern League and the European Integration"T.Miyajima et al.(eds.), Regionalism and Immigration in the Context of European Integration, The Japan Center for Area Studies, National Museum of Ethnology. 51-61 (1999)

Shinichiro Murakami：“北方联盟与欧洲一体化”T. Miyajima 等人（编辑），欧洲一体化背景下的区域主义和移民，日本区域研究中心，国家民族学博物馆 51-61（1999 年）。 ）

津田 由美子: "ベルギー・ルクセンブルク"小川有美編『EU諸国』自由国民社. 361-388 (1999)

Yumiko Tsuda：《比利时和卢森堡》，小川由美编辑《欧盟国家》Jiyuukokuminsha 361-388 (1999)。