A comparative study between Japan and EU concerning procedural fairness and trust about citizen participation in environmental planning

本研究探讨了程序公平和信任对环境规划社会接受度的影响，这是特别难以达成一致的。欧盟的案例研究和日本与欧洲之间的比较实验进行了。案例研究结果表明，程序公平是折衷决策被接受的重要决定因素，而与信任相关的意见相似性决定了折衷决策的赞成与反对。实验结果表明，社会接受度不仅受到程序公平的影响，这有利于公共利益，而且还受到意见相似度的影响，这代表了个人利益。

This study investigated the effect of procedural fairness and trust on social acceptance of environmental planning, which are particularly difficult to achieve agreement. Case studies in EU and comparative experiments between Japan and Europe were conducted. Results from case study showed that procedural fairness was a significant determinant of acceptance of eclectic decision, while opinion similarity related to trust determined the dichotomy between approval and disapproval. Results from experiments showed that social acceptance was influenced not only by procedural fairness, which contributed to public benefit, but also by opinion similarity, which represented personal benefit.