A comparative study of the Jaina logic and Buddhist logic : Akalanka's way of differentiating his position from the Buddhist

通过本研究可以观察到，阿卡兰卡的立场与佛教的观点有所区别，特别是在对无常证明的论证上。包括阿卡兰卡在内的耆那教逻辑学家批评佛教用来证明短暂性的逻辑理性“存在”是导致与正确结果相反的原因，而耆那教逻辑学家则用同样的理由“存在”来证明耆那教世界观的一种形式“多样性”或“变化”。对于耆那教的逻辑学家来说，瞬时性的证明和多元性的证明是同一枚硬币的两面。

It was observed through this research that Akalanka differentiates his position from the Buddhist view especially in the arguments on the proof of momentariness. The Jaina logicians, including Akalanka, criticize the logical reason "existence", which the Buddhist use in the proof of momentariness, as being the reason that leads to the opposite consequence to the proper one, whereas the Jaina logicians prove "manifoldness" or "alteration", which is a form of the Jaina's worldview, by means of the same reason "existence". For the Jaina logicians, the proof of momentariness and that of manifoldness are two sides of the same coin.