A securing of publicity rule and usufruct in the privatization of public facilities

由于调查了指定管理者在信息披露、个人信息保护、公共设施管理中的行政程序方面的定位，指定manager.it变得很清楚，很少有地方政府参与执法引擎和行政机构。另一方面，指定管理人能否履行一系列程序的问题确实出现了，因此，在条例中，我们在执法机构和行政机构中设置了指定管理人，至于文件管理，个人信息的处理，许可机关使用时的程序，我所进行的地方政府的责任是可取的程序和抗议，如披露，听证会时的许可取消从角度来看，发现透明度的用益权和居民的管理。

As a result of having investigated the positioning of the designated manager in regulation of information disclosure, personal information protection, administrative procedure in the management of the public facilities by the designated manager.it became clear that there were extremely few local governments plac in an enforcement engine and the administrative agency. On the other hand, the problem whether a designated manager could perform a series of procedures really rose.Therefore, in the regulations, we place a designated manager in an enforcement organization and the administrative agency, and, as for the document management, the handling of the personal information, the procedure at the time of the licensing authority use, what I carry out by the responsibility of the local government is desirable for a procedure and protest such as disclosure, hearing at the time of the permission cancel from a point of view finding transparency of usufruct and the management of inhabitants.