Understanding and challenging inequality in culture

理解和挑战文化中的不平等

• 批准号: AH/S004483/1
• 负责人: Mark Taylor
• 金额: $ 24.88万
• 依托单位: University of Sheffield
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Fellowship
• 财政年份: 2019
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2019 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FS004483%2F1
• 关键词: Understanding; challenging; inequality; culture

The Creative Industries Sector Deal positions the Creative Industries as a central part of the UK economy in the imminent post-Brexit period, with major implications for its role not simply economically, but also socially and culturally. It also recognises that the Creative Industries are sites of inequality, although questions are raised about whether this is primarily to do with messaging, in which people from minority and disadvantaged backgrounds simply don't know enough about what working in the Creative Industries can offer them.Understanding and Challenging Inequality in Culture (UCIC) aims to directly address issues raised in the Industrial Strategy and in the Creative Industries Sector Deal. It builds on several previous AHRC-funded projects in order to understand the contemporary dynamics of inequality in culture, addressing both cultural labour and participation, through the analysis of existing data with the potential to shed light on inequalities in areas that have not had a major focus so far. It does so through five central research questions, coproduction with key actors in the Creative Industries throughout, and a plan for impact through which inequalities in culture can be meaningfully challenged. It uses existing data throughout, in order to make the most of the UK's strong data resources around culture, both datasets designed for academic analysis, and data originally collected for other reasons which can be analysed to answer questions about inequality in culture.The five questions are:1. How can members of underrepresented groups access work in the creative industries? How successful are current approaches to challenging inequalities?2. How far do boards of directors, and of trustees, reflect and reinforce existing inequalities in the creative industries?3. Do snapshots of inequality in culture conceal high levels of year-on-year change in participation, both within and across forms? 4. How does understanding cultural participation as a network inform our understanding of inequality in culture?5. How similar are the dynamics of inequality in the creative industries in the UK to those of a salient international comparator?These questions have been chosen in order to work across different parts of the Creative Industries: RQ1 involves analysis of access to work in the Creative Industries, which have historically mainly been answered using qualitative methods; RQ2 involves systematic analysis of the most senior levels of organisations in the Creative Industries, above even workforce level; RQ3 involves the analysis of changes in cultural participation, rather than merely differences, to understand the persistence and volatility of inequality in cultural participation; RQ4 involves the analysis of participation at the organisational rather than individual level, and RQ5 puts inequality in culture in the UK into an international context. Through answering these questions, issues of inequality will be raised at different levels across the Creative Industries, in order that the questions raised in the Creative Industries Sector Deal can be comprehensively addressed and action taken.UCIC will answer these questions in collaboration with two key organisations in the Creative Industries, who are positioned to effectively challenge the sector and work alongside organisations within to make changes.

创意产业部门协议将创意产业定位为即将到来的脱欧后英国经济的核心部分，不仅在经济上，而且在社会和文化上都具有重大意义。它也承认创意产业是不平等的场所，尽管有人质疑这是否主要与信息传递有关，因为来自少数族裔和弱势背景的人根本不知道在创意产业工作能给他们带来什么。理解和挑战文化不平等（UCIC）旨在直接解决产业战略和创意产业部门协议中提出的问题。它建立在以前几个由人权理事会资助的项目的基础上，通过对现有数据的分析，了解文化不平等的当代动态，解决文化劳动和参与问题，有可能揭示迄今为止尚未成为主要重点的领域的不平等现象。它通过五个核心研究问题，与创意产业的关键参与者合作，以及一项影响计划来实现这一目标，通过该计划，文化中的不平等可以受到有意义的挑战。它在整个过程中使用现有数据，以充分利用英国强大的文化数据资源，包括为学术分析设计的数据集，以及最初因其他原因收集的数据，这些数据可以分析以回答有关文化不平等的问题。这五个问题是：1。弱势群体的成员如何进入创意产业工作？当前挑战不平等的方法有多成功？董事会和受托人在多大程度上反映和加强了创意产业中现有的不平等？文化不平等的快照是否掩盖了参与的高水平年度变化，无论是内部还是跨形式？4. 将文化参与作为一个网络来理解如何帮助我们理解文化中的不平等？英国创意产业不平等的动态与一个重要的国际比较国有多相似？选择这些问题是为了在创意产业的不同部分工作：RQ1涉及对创意产业工作机会的分析，这在历史上主要使用定性方法来回答；RQ2涉及对创意产业组织最高层的系统分析，甚至高于员工水平；RQ3涉及分析文化参与的变化，而不仅仅是差异，以了解文化参与中不平等的持久性和波动性；RQ4涉及对组织而非个人层面参与的分析，RQ5将英国文化中的不平等置于国际背景下。通过回答这些问题，将在创意产业的不同层面提出不平等问题，以便全面解决创意产业部门协议中提出的问题并采取行动。UCIC将与创意产业中的两个关键组织合作回答这些问题，这两个组织将有效地挑战该行业，并与内部组织一起做出改变。

项目成果

Audience Data and Research - Perspectives from Cultural Policy, Arts Management and Practice

观众数据与研究——文化政策、艺术管理与实践的视角

• DOI: 10.4324/9781032632452-9
• 发表时间: 2023
• 作者: Hanquinet L

"There's No Way That You Get Paid to Do the Arts": Unpaid Labour Across the Cultural and Creative Life Course

“搞艺术是拿不到报酬的”：贯穿文创生命历程的无酬劳动

• DOI: 10.1177/1360780419895291
• 发表时间: 2020
• 期刊: Sociological Research Online
• 影响因子: 1.6
• 作者: Brook O

Social Mobility and 'Openness' in Creative Occupations since the 1970s

20 世纪 70 年代以来创意职业的社会流动性和“开放性”

• DOI: 10.1177/00380385221129953
• 发表时间: 2022
• 期刊: Sociology
• 影响因子: 2.9
• 作者: Brook O

sj-docx-1-eur-10.1177_09697764221113750 - Supplemental material for Cultural governance within and across cities and regions: Evidence from the English publicly funded arts sector

sj-docx-1-eur-10.1177_09697764221113750 - 城市和地区内部及跨文化治理的补充材料：来自英国公共资助艺术部门的证据

• DOI: 10.25384/sage.20797508
• 发表时间: 2022
• 作者: O'Brien D

Collecting and classifying data on audience identity: the cultural background of festival audiences

观众身份数据的收集和分类：节日观众的文化背景

• DOI: 10.1080/09548963.2023.2212636
• 发表时间: 2023
• 期刊: Cultural Trends
• 影响因子: 3.1
• 作者: Johanson K