课题基金 / 基金详情

Assessing Academic Oral Presentations in English Medium Education: Navigating Linguistic and Social Justice Implications of Decision Making

Assessing Academic Oral Presentations in English Medium Education: Navigating Linguistic and Social Justice Implications of Decision Making
评估英语教育中的学术口头陈述:探讨决策的语言和社会正义影响
批准号:
ES/W005530/1
负责人:
Louise Palmour
金额:
$11.57万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Fellowship
财政年份:
2021
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2021 至 --

项目摘要

项目成果

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
Oral communication skills facilitate learning, thinking and empower individuals to participate in society. Through talk we generate new ideas in collaboration with others (Littleton and Mecer, 2013) meaning oracy skills have become key to professional life. Crucially, oratorial prowess provides citizens with the communicative means by which to have their voices heard in civic arenas. However, not all verbal and non-verbal communicative practices are judged as equal and there is a pressing need for intensified action in education to prevent communicative inequality from undermining civic agency (Coleman, 2012).Pedagogical interventions are needed to develop oracy skills in a way which addresses unequal communicative status.Therefore, it is vital that tasks which facilitate oral communication skills development feature as learning and assessment tools in educational settings. Academic oral presentations (AOPs) are one genre used widely as learning and assessment tasks in UK Higher Education, often to provide oratory arenas in which students can develop and display disciplinary knowledge and oracy skills (Palmour 2020). However, the oracy demands involved in producing and evaluating AOPs may not be adequately recognised and not taught in ways which tackle communicative inequality.My doctorate investigated how AOP assessments are constructed and evaluated on English for Academic Purposes programmes and degree programmes in a range of disciplines in UK HE. Crucial insights were generated into the decision-making processes involved in navigating AOP events from student and teacher assessor perspectives. Surveys of content degree module practice raised significant questions regardingthe 'hidden assessment of oracy' (Doherty et al, 2011) in AOPs. The majority of HE practitioners surveyed rated delivery as highly important and the majority reported that they provide feedback on oracy skills which they see as vital to a successful AOP performance, but that oracy skills were not part of the assessment criteria. As part of the fellowship, I will conduct a contained fieldwork study which investigates how learning is assessed on content degree programmes through AOPs, particularly what judgements are made on oracy skills.This new research coupled with my doctoral findings will secure comprehensive data and sharper insights on AOP events to generate a manuscript on Assessing AOPs in Higher Education. Furthermore, the fieldwork findings on oral assessment contribute to English Medium Education research (Baker and Hüttner, 2019 and Jenkins et al., 2019) which deepens understandings of communicative practices in diverse linguacultural settings in international universities.My doctoral fieldwork, which investigated AOPs used as assessments for gatekeeping purposes on English for Academic Purposes (EAP) courses, demonstrated that the assessment criteria in many cases does not reflect the social and communicative reality of the task. For instance, in EAP AOP assessment which includes 50% spoken linguistic criteria, students significantly downplayed speaking skills because of the opportunity to use slides and non-verbal communication. The fieldwork also generated a comprehensive model of decision-making processes enacted by teacher assessors when engaged in rating AOPs. The range of tools represented in the model demonstrates the complex cognitive, social and emotional demands AOP assessment places on teacher assessors. During the fellowship, such doctoral findings will be disseminated through a series of written publications, further data-led reflection workshops with HE practitioners and academic talks. These events will promote critical reflection and action on the validity concerns associated with the ways oracy is developed and assessed in AOP tasks.The fellowship is a wonderful opportunity to foster communicative awareness and confidence among staff and students in academia and beyond.
期刊论文(3)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Assessing Language through Oral Presentations: The Case of Construct Underrepresentation in EAP contexts
通过口头陈述评估语言:EAP 背景下建构代表性不足的案例
DOI: --
发表时间:
期刊: Language Testing
影响因子: 4.1
作者: [Louise Palmour]
通讯作者: Louise Palmour
Assessing speaking through multimodal oral presentations: The case of construct underrepresentation in EAP contexts
通过多模式口头陈述评估演讲:EAP 环境中建构代表性不足的案例
DOI: 10.1177/02655322231183077
发表时间: 2023
期刊: Language Testing
影响因子: 4.1
作者: [Palmour L]
通讯作者: Palmour L
Assessing oral presentations: An analysis of score-reaching dialogue between EAP practitioners
评估口头陈述:EAP 实践者之间的得分对话分析
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101210
发表时间: 2023
期刊: Journal of English for Academic Purposes
影响因子: 3
作者: [Palmour L]
通讯作者: Palmour L
海外基金