权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Work Hour Regulation for Physician Trainees: Educational and Clinical Outcomes

实习医师的工作时间规定：教育和临床成果

基本信息

批准号：
8110527
负责人：
KEVIN G VOLPP
金额：
$ 76.27万
依托单位：
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
依托单位国家：
美国
项目类别：
财政年份：
2009
资助国家：
美国
起止时间：
2009-07-01 至 2014-04-30
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/8110527
关键词：
Accreditation Acute Affect American American College of Physicians Area Aviation Behavioral Caring Cessation of life Charge Chronic Clinical Cognitive Consensus Country Data Effectiveness Environment Face Failure Fatigue Frequencies Health Health Services Research Hearing Hospitals Hour Institute of Medicine (U.S.)Internal Medicine Knowledge Length of Stay Link Medical Medical Errors Medical Examiners Nursing Staff Occupations Operative Surgical Procedures Outcome Patients Performance Physician Assistants Physicians Policies Probability Quality Indicator Recommendation Regulation Relative (related person)Residencies Safety Sampling Schedule Site Sleep Deprivation Statutes and Laws Study Section Surveys Teaching Hospitals Time Training Training Programs United States Work clinically significant design experience graduate medical education improved innovation medical specialties mortality patient safety planetary Atmosphere programs response

项目摘要

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Regulation of work hours for physicians in training was put in place by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) in 2003, long after similar regulations were implemented in trucking, aviation, and in other occupations where acute and chronic sleep deprivation raise significant concerns about safety. The impact of duty hour regulation has been controversial. While there is some evidence that this improved mortality outcomes in the short-term, little is known about the impact on educational outcomes, longer-term clinical outcomes, or the mechanisms creating inter-hospital differences in the effectiveness of duty hour reform in improving either clinical or educational outcomes. With assistance from the American Board of Surgery, the American Board of Internal Medicine, the National Board of Medical Examiners, the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine and Surgery, and the American College of Physicians, we propose to complete the following specific aims: 1. To describe the variety and frequency of program-level behavioral responses to duty hour reform and resident work conditions by conducting national surveys of program directors and residents in Internal Medicine (IM) and General Surgery (GS) informed by qualitative field work at a sample of IM and GS residency programs. 2. To assess how educational outcomes (board scores) have changed over time in conjunction with duty hour reform for residents in different specialties. 3. To examine how clinical outcomes (mortality, failure-to-rescue, probability of a prolonged length of stay, patient safety indicators) have changed over time beyond the first two years post-duty hour reform. 4. To examine the relationship between changes in educational and clinical outcomes and hospital financial performance, physician extender and nurse staffing levels, and program responses identified in the national survey of program directors. The proposed analysis will be the first to pull together national data on educational and clinical outcomes and will help us understand why duty hour regulation reform for physicians in training worked - or did not work - in terms of improving educational and clinical outcomes. This is an important policy question given that the physicians who are the subject of these reforms provide care to tens of millions of Americans each year. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE Regulation of duty hours for physicians in training in 2003 represented one of the most significant efforts ever undertaken to improve patient safety in American hospitals. It is largely unknown how these regulations affected patient outcomes, the quality of physician training, and how programs responded to improve or maintain patient outcomes and the quality of residency training. In this study, we will examine how residency programs and hospitals responded to the duty hour reform and how these behavioral responses determined which residency programs and hospitals experienced relative improvements or worsening in educational and clinical outcomes, important questions given that tens of millions of Americans receive care from the physicians in training who were the subject of the duty hour regulation.

描述(由申请人提供)：2003年，医学研究生教育认证委员会(ACGME)制定了对接受培训的医生的工作时间的规定，在此之前很久，卡车运输、航空和其他急性和慢性睡眠剥夺引起严重安全问题的职业也实施了类似的规定。值班时间规定的影响一直存在争议。虽然有一些证据表明，这在短期内改善了死亡率结果，但对教育结果、长期临床结果的影响，或者造成医院间值班时间改革在改善临床或教育结果方面的有效性的机制，人们知之甚少。在美国外科委员会、美国内科委员会、国家医学检查员委员会、内外科项目主任协会和美国医师学会的协助下，我们建议完成以下具体目标：1.通过对内科(IM)和普通外科(GS)项目主任和住院医师进行全国调查，通过对IM和GS住院医师项目的定性实地工作，描述项目层面对值班时间改革和常驻工作条件的行为反应的种类和频率。2.评估随着不同专科住院医师的值班时间改革，教育成果(考试成绩)如何随时间变化。3.检查临床结果(死亡率、抢救失败、延长住院时间的可能性、患者安全指标)在值班后头两年改革后的头两年随时间的变化。4.检查教育和临床结果的变化与医院财务业绩、医生扩展人员和护士配置水平以及全国项目主任调查中确定的项目反应之间的关系。拟议的分析将是第一次收集关于教育和临床结果的国家数据，并将帮助我们理解为什么在培训中对医生进行值班时间监管改革在改善教育和临床结果方面有效-或没有奏效。这是一个重要的政策问题，因为作为这些改革的主体的医生每年为数千万美国人提供护理。2003年《培训医生值班时间与公共健康的相关性规定》是美国医院为提高患者安全所做的最重要的努力之一。这些法规如何影响患者的结果、医生培训的质量，以及项目如何应对以改善或维持患者的结果和住院医师培训的质量，目前在很大程度上尚不清楚。在这项研究中，我们将研究住院医师计划和医院如何对值班时间改革做出反应，以及这些行为反应如何决定哪些住院医师计划和医院在教育和临床结果方面经历了相对改善或恶化，这是重要的问题，因为数千万美国人接受了接受培训的医生的护理，这些医生是值班时间规定的对象。

项目成果

期刊论文数量（9）

专著数量（0）

科研奖励数量（0）

会议论文数量（0）

专利数量（0）

To Leave or to Lie? Are Concerns about a Shift-Work Mentality and Eroding Professionalism as a Result of Duty-Hour Rules Justified?

DOI：
10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00603.x
发表时间：
2010-09-01
期刊：
MILBANK QUARTERLY
影响因子：
6.6
作者：
Szymczak, Julia E.;Brooks, Joanna Veazey;Bosk, Charles L.
通讯作者：
Bosk, Charles L.

Association of the 2011 ACGME resident duty hour reforms with mortality and readmissions among hospitalized Medicare patients.

DOI：
10.1001/jama.2014.15273
发表时间：
2014-12-10
期刊：
JAMA
影响因子：
0
作者：
Patel MS;Volpp KG;Small DS;Hill AS;Even-Shoshan O;Rosenbaum L;Ross RN;Bellini L;Zhu J;Silber JH
通讯作者：
Silber JH

Sleep, supervision, education, and service: views of junior and senior residents.

睡眠、监督、教育和服务：初级和高级居民的观点。