课题基金 / 基金详情

Dynamic and stable regulation of aggression through DNA methylation

Dynamic and stable regulation of aggression through DNA methylation
通过 DNA 甲基化动态稳定地调节攻击行为
批准号:
9064228
负责人:
GENE E ROBINSON
金额:
$19.83万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
财政年份:
2015
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2015-05-07 至 2018-02-28

项目摘要

项目成果

GENE E ROBINSON的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
 描述(由申请人提供):攻击性行为是我们社会中的一种破坏性影响,因为根据定义,它旨在造成身体或心理伤害。在人类中,在不利的社会环境中长大会强烈影响攻击倾向的发展,基因型变异也会使个体易于攻击。DNA甲基化是一种表观遗传修饰,它以相对稳定的模式存在,但可以在特定的位点响应环境而发生变化。这种稳定/动态的双重性可能将DNA甲基化置于基因型和环境对行为影响之间的调节界面。该提案将研究DNA甲基化是否介导基因型和环境对蜜蜂攻击性的影响,蜜蜂是一种表现出良好特征的攻击性行为的模型,与果蝇不同,它具有功能齐全的,类似果蝇的甲基化系统。蜜蜂的品系在攻击性方面有所不同,我们先前的工作表明,高度攻击性的非洲蜜蜂(AHB)与攻击性较低的欧洲蜜蜂(EHB)在大脑基因表达和DNA甲基化方面存在差异。此外,EHB暴露于报警信息素引起的攻击显示在一些相同的基因的表达变化。我们将测试这一假设,即DNA甲基化作为一个稳定的表观遗传标记调节遗传差异的侵略,同时也作为一个动态调节器响应环境刺激,促进侵略。在哺乳动物中,DNA甲基化模式可以通过主动DNA去甲基化来调节,其由10 - 11易位酶(泰特)和胸腺嘧啶DNA糖基化酶(TDG)介导。为了确定蜜蜂中是否存在泰特/TDG依赖的DNA去甲基化机制并调节攻击性,将使用RNA干扰(RNAi)敲除蜜蜂大脑中的TDG;初步结果表明,蜜蜂中的TDG依赖于TET/TDG。20%的击倒。我们将测量TDG敲除蜜蜂中的DNA去甲基化和侵略性,以及氧化的5-甲基胞嘧啶衍生物的积累,这些衍生物是其他生物中活跃的DNA甲基化的已知中间体。为了探索DNA甲基化是否也将攻击性作为与基因型相关的稳定性状,我们将检测AHB和EHB中攻击性相关基因的DNA甲基化模式的稳定性。最后,我们将比较遗传和环境诱导的攻击性背景之间的攻击相关基因的甲基化模式。我们希望在两者之间观察到相似的甲基化模式,支持我们的假设,即DNA甲基化是基因型和环境对攻击性影响的调节剂。
英文摘要
 DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Aggressive behavior is a damaging influence in our society, since by definition it is intended to inflict physical or psychological harm. In humans, growing up in a socially adverse environment can strongly influence the development of aggressive tendencies, and genotypic variation can also predispose individuals to aggression. DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification that exists in relatively stable patterns, but can change at specific loci in response to the environment. This stable/dynamic duality potentially places DNA methylation at the regulatory interface between genotypic and environmental influences on behavior. This proposal will investigate whether DNA methylation mediates the influences of genotype and environment on aggression in the honey bee, a model that exhibits well-characterized aggressive behaviors, and unlike the fruit fly, has a fully functional, mammalian-like methylation system. Strains of bees differ in their aggressiveness, and our prior work has shown that the highly aggressive African honey bee (AHB) shows differences in brain gene expression and DNA methylation from the less aggressive European honey bee (EHB). In addition, EHB provoked to aggression by exposure to alarm pheromone show expression changes in some of the same genes. We will test the hypothesis that DNA methylation serves as a stable epigenetic mark regulating inherited differences in aggression, while also acting as a dynamic regulator responding to environmental stimuli that promote aggression. In mammals, DNA methylation patterns can be modulated through active DNA demethylation, which is mediated by ten-eleven translocase (TET) and thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) enzymes. To determine whether a TET/TDG-dependent DNA demethylation mechanism exists in bees and regulates aggression, TDG will be knocked down in the bee brain using RNA interference (RNAi); preliminary results indicate a ca. 20% knockdown. We will measure DNA demethylation and aggression in the TDG knockdown bees, as well as the accumulation of oxidized 5-methylcytosine derivatives, which are known intermediates of active DNA methylation in other organisms. To explore whether DNA methylation also establishes aggression as a stable trait associated with genotype, we will examine the stability of DNA methylation patterns at aggression-related genes in AHB and EHB. Lastly, we will compare methylation patterns at aggression-related genes between the hereditary and environmentally-induced aggressive contexts. We expect to observe similar methylation patterns between the two, supporting our hypothesis that DNA methylation is a regulator underlying both genotypic and environmental effects on aggression.
期刊论文(1)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4594-0
发表时间: 2018-03-26
期刊: BMC genomics
影响因子: 4.4
作者: [Herb BR, Shook MS, Fields CJ, Robinson GE]
通讯作者: Robinson GE
Regulation of Stable Fat Loss in a Model System
Johnny Bee Good: Bees as Models to Study the Hijacking of the Reward System
Johnny Bee Good: Bees as Models to Study the Hijacking of the Reward System
Johnny Bee Good: Bees as Models to Study the Hijacking of the Reward System
海外基金