1950S JAPANESE REORGANIZATION OF THE SYSTEM OF LOCAL BOARD OF EDCATION

首先，分析了《1956年地方教育行政管理组织运行法》(新法)草案中有关教育局财政权力的词语的转换。本研究澄清了教育部在被要求修改《1948年教育局法》(旧法)时，为保留地方教育局而进行的斗争。到目前为止，还没有基于这些内部材料的考虑。我们在最终报告中对它们进行了整理和复制，以便向公众开放。大多数研究者解释了旧法律和新法律之间的不连续性。但在这项研究中，主要的压力落在连续性上。接下来，我们采访了铃木和木田两位关键人物，铃木是内务次官，木田是当时的文部省长官。这次采访证明了我们的坚持，最终安排了日本教师工会等教育压力团体，城乡协会等地方相关压力团体，自由党、民主党等政党的行动和计划。可以说，许多演员都在为最大化自己的利益而竞争。当我们解释和解释旧法的修改过程时，我们应该注意到，多元化的方法对这种情况是有用的。

First of all, transitions of words and phrases concerning a financial authority of the board of education in sime versions of drafts of the "Law on the Organization and Operation of Local Educational Administration of 1956"(the new law)were analyzed.This research clarified that Ministry of Education struggled for keeping the local board of education against Ministry of Home Affairs when they were requested to revised the "Law on the Board of Education of 1948"(the old law). By now, there was no consideration based on these internal materials. We arranged and reproduce them on the final report in order to open them to the public. Most researchers explain the discontinuity between the old law and the new law. But in this studay the main stress falls on the continuity. Next, we interviewed two key persons, Messrs. Suzuki and Kida, Suzuki was the undersecretary of Ministry of Home Affairs and Kida was director of Ministry of Education then. Our insistence was proven by this interview.Finally, the action and the plan of education pressure groups such as Japan Teacher's Union, and local related pressure groups such as the Town and Village Associations, and political parties such as Liberal Party, or Democratic Party, were arranged. We can say many actors competed for maximizing their interest. When we explain and interpretation the process of revision of the old law, we should notice that the pluralism approach is useful for this case.