A Study of Chinese-Korean Mutual Recognition Through Korean Envoy Accounts of Missions to Beijing

这份研究报告包括两篇论文。《朝鲜驻华使团记述释义》、《朝鲜驻华使团记述与日本研究》、《朝鲜驻华使团记述及日本研究》详述了我为编纂我对驻日朝鲜驻华使团记述所做的调查，接着讨论了每一记述的作者和撰写日期，最后是作者的简短自传和他们的致敬之旅的注解。这项调查首次向研究人员介绍了日本现存的所有账户，并为他们提供了评估其内容所需的信息。我介绍的33本书都是手稿格式的，其中27本被认为是独一无二的副本，因为在日本以外的图书馆中尚无其他版本，而其余5本保存在作者自己的收藏中。希望这份报告将建立在《韩国驻华使节记述汇编》(与韩国学者林基宗合编)的基础上，为世界各地有兴趣研究朝鲜朝贡北京使团和中韩相互承认接触的学者提供有用的资源。《韩国驻华使节记述和日本研究》是2001年12月在韩国举行的国际会议和东亚研究会议上发表的一篇论文。本文揭示了目前对韩国驻日使节研究中存在的误区，并通过与19世纪上半叶朝鲜驻华使节的经历进行比较，说明了这一时期日朝关系不佳与中国与朝鲜关系密切的反差。

This research report contains two papers. "Explanatory Notes on Choson Yonhaengnok [Korean Envoy Accounts of Missions to Beijing] extant in Japan, and "Korean Envoy Accounts of Missions to Beijing and Japanese Studies"."Explanatory Notes on Choson Yonhaengnok [Korean Envoy Accounts of Missions to Beijing ] extant in Japan" details the surveys I made to compile my study Korean Envoy Accounts of Missions to Beijing extant in japan, moves on to a discussion of the author and date of composition of each Accounts, and concludes with brief autobiographies of the authors and notes on their tribute journeys. The survey introduces researchers for the first time to all Accounts extant in Japan, and provides them with the information necessary to assess their contents. The thirty-three Accounts I introduce are all in manuscript format Twenty-seven are believed to be unique copies, as no alternative versions are known to exist in libraries outside Japan, while the other five were preserved in their authors' own collections . It is hoped that this report will build on the foundations established by A Compilation of Korean Envoy Accounts of Missions to Beijing (co-edited with the South Korean scholar Lin Ki-zung), and will be a useful resource for scholars around the world interested in researching Korean tribute missions to Beijing and Chinese-Korean mutual recognition contacts generally."Korean Envoy Accounts of Missions to Beijing and Japanese Studies" was a paper presented in the international conference and East Asian Studies held in South Korea in December 2001. The paper exposed the misconceptions that exist in current research on Korean envoys to Japan, and by comparing their experience with that of Korean envoys to Peking in the first half of the nineteenth century illuminated the contrast between the poor relations between Japan and Korea and the close relationship existing between China and Korea at this period.