AN "ISAGOGIC" COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE ETYMOLOGICAL DICTIONARY IN THE ROMANCE LEXICOGRAPHY

本研究的目的是比较在罗曼语词典编纂中经得起科学批评的三本词典：弗里德里希·迪兹于1853年在波恩出版的罗曼语词源词典；1861 ^ 2;1869 - 70 ^ 3;1878 ^ 5;1887^5，古斯塔夫·柯尔汀的《拉丁罗曼史词典》（Lateinisch-romanisches Woerterbuch）， 1890-91^1在帕德伯恩出版；1901 ^ 2;1907年^3和Wilhelm Meyer-Luebke的Romanisches etymologches Woerterbuch（罗曼语词源词典）于1911- 1920年在海德堡出版^1；1924 ^ 2;1930 - 35 ^ 3;1968 ^ 4;1972 ^ 5;1992^6，并给出比较这些字典的结果。本研究的主要重点是比较Meyer-Luebke的浪漫词源词典的每个版本。据说第二版与第一版相同，第四、第五、第六版与第三版相同。在本研究中，我们将Meyer-Luebke词典的第一版和第二版称为a版本，其余的称为b版本。研究发现，Meyer-Luebke《浪漫词源词典》的两个版本在词源解释方面存在很大差异。例如，版本A的引理“^*aballinca”已被修改为版本B的引理“^*melanca, melenca”。

The aim of this study is to compare three dictionaries that can endure scientific criticism on etymology in the Romance lexicography, Etymologisches Woerterbuch der romanischen Sprachen (Etymological Dictionary of the Romance Languages) by Friedrich Diez published in Bonn in 1853^1; 1861^2; 1869-70^3; 1878^5; 1887^5, Lateinisch-romanisches Woerterbuch (Latin-Romance Dictionary) by Gustav Koerting published in Paderborn in 1890-91^1 ; 1901^2 ; 1907^3 and Romanisches etymologisches Woerterbuch (Romance Etymological Dictionary) by Wilhelm Meyer-Luebke published in Heidelberg in 1911-20^1; 1924^2; 1930-35^3; 1968^4; 1972^5; 1992^6, and to present the result of comparing these dictionaries.The main focus of this research is to compare each version of the Meyer-Luebke's Romance Etymological Dictionary. It is said that the second edition is the same as the first, and that the forth, the fifth and the sixth editions are the same as the third edition. In this research, for the Meyer-Luebke's Dictionary we call the first and second editions a version A. the rest a version B.It was found that two versions of the Meyer-Luebke's Romance Etymological Dictionary are quite different with respect to the etymological interpretation. For example, the lemma "^*aballinca" of the version A has been modified to the lemma "^*melanca, melenca" of the version B.