Development of Data Analysis System Oriented to EBN for the Nursing Researches

为了阐明日本人对循证护理的态度，我们在全国范围内进行了一项调查，调查对象是日本护理学院/大学协会（Nihon Kangokei Daigaku Kyougikai）的89所高校的3155名护理科学教学人员。问卷邮寄给每位受试者，并要求他们在2001年11月底前寄回。截止到2002年1月末，共收到1170份问卷（男性198份，女性961份，未知11份）。应答率为37.1%。调查对象中实际学习护理科学的占83.1%，其中以定量方法为主的占32.3%，定性方法为主的占21.4%，两种方法同时使用的占46.3%。对于“你的研究是否科学”这两个问题，“抽样方法”和“结果解释”的“是”的回答比例都相对较低，并且所有项目的“是”的回答都是按照教授、副教授、讲师、助理教授等头衔依次递减的。对于“您的讲座是否科学”的问题，回答“是”的分别为“护理评估”23.9%、“护理诊断”13.6%、“计划”16.5%、“护理干预”20.1%。在“护理临床指导是否科学”一题中，28.1%回答“护理评估”，15.5%回答“护理诊断”，20.9%回答“计划”，20.9%回答“护理干预”。在“您的讲座是否科学”的问题上，“是”的回答在教授组中最高，在助理教授组中最低，但在“您的临床护理教学是否科学”的问题上，回答是相反的。主要结果已公布，并可在我们的网站（http://www.clg.niigata-u.ac.jp/~takagi/kaken-h14/kakenmenu.html）上访问。少

To elucidate the attitudes toward Evidence Based Nursing (EBN) in Japan, we conducted the nationwide survey, in which subjects were 3,155 teaching members of nursing sciences in 89 colleges and universities that are joined to the Nihon Kangokei Daigaku Kyougikai (Japanese Nursing College/University Association).The questionnaire was mailed to each subject and asked to send it back until the end of November, 2001. Finally, we received 1,170 answers (198 males, 961 females, and 11 unknown) until the end of January, 2002.The response rate was 37.1%. No significant difference was found statistically between the population and samples about the distributions by gender and by special fields.83.1% of respondants actually study on nursing sciences, of which 32.3% mainly use quantitative methods, 21.4% mainly use qualitative methods, and 46.3% use the both types of methods.The yes response proportions were relatively low to both of the questions whether your study is scientific for the sampling … More method and for the interpretation of results, and the yes response of all items decreased gradually in order of title such as professor, associate professor, lecturer, and assistant professor.The yes response to the question whether your lecture is scientific are 23.9% about "Nursing Assessment", 13.6% about "Nursing Diagnosis", 16.5% about "Planning", and 20.1% about "Nursing Interventions", respectively.The yes response to the question whether your clinical instruction in nursing is scientific are 28.1% about "Nursing Assessment", 15.5% about "Nursing Diagnosis", 20.9% about "Planning", and 20.9% about "Nursing interventions", respectively.Concerning the questions whether your lecture is scientific, the yes responses are the highest in professor group, and the lowest in assistant professor group, but the response was reversed concerning the question whether your clinical instruction in nursing is scientific.The main results are published and can be accessed in our Web site (http://www.clg.niigata-u.ac.jp/~takagi/kaken-h14/kakenmenu.html). Less