课题基金 / 基金详情

The Interaction of Affect and Deliberation in Decision Making

The Interaction of Affect and Deliberation in Decision Making
决策中情感与深思熟虑的相互作用
批准号:
0241313
负责人:
Paul Slovic
金额:
$24.31万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
Standard Grant
财政年份:
2003
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2003-03-01 至 2006-02-28

项目摘要

项目成果

Paul Slovic的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
The proposed research attempts to articulate the interrelated roles of affect and deliberation in guiding judgments and decisions. As used here, "affect" means the specific quality of "goodness" or "badness" (i) experienced as a feeling state (with or without awareness) and (ii) demarcating a positive or negative quality of a stimulus. We have characterized reliance on such feelings when making judgments or decisions as "the affect heuristic."Research in cognitive and social psychology and cognitive neuroscience that informs us about two basic modes of thinking, experiential and analytic. The experiential system is intuitive, automatic, image-based, fast, and intimately associated with affective feelings. The analytic system is deliberative, reason-based, and slow. There are strong elements of rationality in both systems. It was the experiential system that enabled human beings to survive during their long period of evolution. Long before there was probability theory, risk assessment, and decision analysis, there were intuition, instinct, and gut feelings to tell us whether an animal was safe to approach or the water was safe to drink. As life became more complex and humans gained more control over their environment, analytic tools were invented to "boost" the rationality of our experiential thinking.We plan in this project to conduct experiments to better understand the role of affect in decision making and the interaction between the experiential, affect-based mode of thinking and more analytic and deliberative processes. These experiments are designed to test specific predictions about the way that individual and environmental factors such as time pressure, cognitive load, age, mood, and instruction to think or give reasons influence the balance of affective and deliberative processing and the judgments and decisions that result from this processing. We shall also address the broader impacts of this research, by demonstrating how the findings provide insight into ways to improve a wide-range of important practical decisions about matters involving finance, medical treatments, cigarette smoking, health insurance, and risk perception.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
NSF-BSF: Willingness to Vaccinate Against COVID-19: Psychological Mechanisms and Ways to Increase Responsiveness
  • 批准号:
    2411613
  • 项目类别:
    Continuing Grant
  • 资助金额:
    $27.0万
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 负责人:
    Paul Slovic
  • 依托单位:
NSF-BSF: Willingness to Vaccinate Against COVID-19: Psychological Mechanisms and Ways to Increase Responsiveness
  • 批准号:
    2149450
  • 项目类别:
    Continuing Grant
  • 资助金额:
    $27.0万
  • 财政年份:
    2022
  • 负责人:
    Paul Slovic
  • 依托单位:
Does introspection increase humanitarian concerns in judgment and decision making?
  • 批准号:
    1757315
  • 项目类别:
    Continuing Grant
  • 资助金额:
    $43.0万
  • 财政年份:
    2018
  • 负责人:
    Paul Slovic
  • 依托单位:
Psychological mechanisms behind organ donation decisions
  • 批准号:
    1559546
  • 项目类别:
    Continuing Grant
  • 资助金额:
    $31.26万
  • 财政年份:
    2016
  • 负责人:
    Paul Slovic
  • 依托单位:
海外基金