RAPID: Cultural Differences in Shaping Diagnostic Testing Regimes in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

RAPID:塑造应对 COVID-19 大流行的诊断测试制度的文化差异

基本信息

项目摘要

The primary objective of this RAPID research project is to further our understanding of the role of political culture in shaping diagnostic testing regimes during the COVID-19 epidemic. The researcher will use qualitative case study methods in four geographical regions. The results of this project will serve to expand our understanding of how political culture shapes the development, implementation, and governance of diagnostic testing particularly during emergencies. It will also help us identify other aspects of political culture including whether citizen responses to and frustrations with emergency diagnostic testing systems take different form across the four regions. Project findings will be widely disseminated to academic, public, and policy audiences. The project will generate articles for academic audiences in the fields of STS, public health, political science, and public policy. Dissemination to the public will be via op-eds and podcast episodes. A white paper will be sent to relevant policymakers. Research methods include conducting interviews, collecting documents, and doing ethnographic observation; when possible and relevant, ethnographic observation of press conferences and government hearings will also be conducted. Documents, interviews, and ethnographic field notes will comprise the data, which will be analyzed using a grounded theory approach. A “snowball” sampling strategy will be used to select interview subjects; initial interview subjects will be asked to suggest others for interview. Initial subjects will be identified through the collected documents; important participants in each testing regime will be recorded. For each of the four case studies to be developed, this will likely include government officials involved in developing COVID-19 responses or regulating diagnostic testing regimes; organizations developing and offering testing; and civil society groups attempting to influence public, private, and non-profit sector action.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.
这个RAPID研究项目的主要目标是进一步了解政治文化在COVID-19疫情期间塑造诊断检测制度的作用。研究人员将在四个地理区域使用定性案例研究方法。该项目的结果将有助于扩大我们对政治文化如何塑造诊断测试的发展,实施和治理的理解,特别是在紧急情况下。它还将帮助我们确定政治文化的其他方面,包括公民对紧急诊断检测系统的反应和挫折感是否在四个地区采取不同的形式。项目结果将广泛传播给学术界、公众和政策受众。该项目将为STS、公共卫生、政治学和公共政策领域的学术受众撰写文章。将通过专栏和播客节目向公众传播。将向相关决策者发送一份白色文件。研究方法包括进行访谈,收集文件和进行民族志观察;在可能和相关的情况下,还将对新闻发布会和政府听证会进行民族志观察。文件,访谈和人种学现场记录将包括数据,将使用扎根理论方法进行分析。我们会以“滚雪球”抽样策略挑选面试对象,并会要求初次面试的对象推荐其他面试对象。将通过收集的文件确定初始受试者;将记录每个测试方案中的重要参与者。对于将要开发的四个案例研究中的每一个,这可能包括参与制定COVID-19应对措施或监管诊断检测制度的政府官员;开发和提供检测的组织;和民间社会团体试图影响公共,私人,和非该奖项反映了NSF的法定使命,并被认为是值得通过评估使用基金会的知识优点和更广泛的影响审查标准。

项目成果

期刊论文数量(2)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
Innovation Policy, Structural Inequality, and COVID-19
创新政策、结构性不平等和 COVID-19
  • DOI:
    10.3167/dt.2020.070213
  • 发表时间:
    2020
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    Parthasarathy, Shobita
  • 通讯作者:
    Parthasarathy, Shobita
More Testing alone will not get us out of this Pandemic
仅靠更多的测试并不能让我们摆脱这场大流行
  • DOI:
    10.1038/d41586-020-02495-y
  • 发表时间:
    2020
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    64.8
  • 作者:
    Parthasarathy, Shobita
  • 通讯作者:
    Parthasarathy, Shobita
{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}

Shobita Parthasarathy其他文献

Patent Applications as Glimpses into the Sociotechnical Imaginary: Ethical Speculation on the Imagined Futures of Emotion AI for Mental Health Monitoring and Detection
专利申请一瞥社会技术想象:对用于心理健康监测和检测的情感人工智能想象未来的伦理推测
Seeing Hoodia, seeing the world
  • DOI:
    10.1057/s41292-020-00187-4
  • 发表时间:
    2020-03-07
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    1.800
  • 作者:
    Shobita Parthasarathy
  • 通讯作者:
    Shobita Parthasarathy
Protecting scientific integrity in an age of generative AI
在生成人工智能时代保护科学完整性
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
    2024
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    11.1
  • 作者:
    Wolfgang Blau;Vinton G. Cerf;Juan Enriquez;Joseph S. Francisco;Urs Gasser;Mary L Gray;Mark Greaves;Barbara J Grosz;K. Jamieson;Gerald H Haug;John L Hennessy;Eric Horvitz;David I Kaiser;A. London;Robin Lovell;Marcia K McNutt;Martha Minow;Tom M. Mitchell;Susan Ness;Shobita Parthasarathy;Saul Perlmutter;William H Press;Jeannette M Wing;Michael Witherell
  • 通讯作者:
    Michael Witherell
Whose knowledge? What values? The comparative politics of patenting life forms in the United States and Europe
  • DOI:
    10.1007/s11077-011-9133-7
  • 发表时间:
    2011-07-14
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    3.700
  • 作者:
    Shobita Parthasarathy
  • 通讯作者:
    Shobita Parthasarathy

Shobita Parthasarathy的其他文献

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

{{ truncateString('Shobita Parthasarathy', 18)}}的其他基金

Constructing Credible Knowledge and Expertise in Air Pollution Regulation and Monitoring: The Problem of Quantification
构建空气污染监管和监测方面的可信知识和专业知识:量化问题
  • 批准号:
    2240343
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 资助金额:
    $ 10万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Scholar's Award: Crisis at the Patent Office: Rethinking the Patentability of Biotechnology in Comparative Perspective
学者奖:专利局的危机:从比较的角度重新思考生物技术的可专利性
  • 批准号:
    0724664
  • 财政年份:
    2007
  • 资助金额:
    $ 10万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant

相似国自然基金

怀尔德“Mathematics as a cultural system”翻译研究
  • 批准号:
    11726404
  • 批准年份:
    2017
  • 资助金额:
    3.0 万元
  • 项目类别:
    数学天元基金项目

相似海外基金

New insights into cultural differences in empathic concern and prosocial behavior: A cross-cultural study in Japan and the U.S.
对移情关注和亲社会行为的文化差异的新见解:日本和美国的跨文化研究
  • 批准号:
    24K16787
  • 财政年份:
    2024
  • 资助金额:
    $ 10万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists
Cultural Schemas in Japanese Schools: Discomfort and Maladjustment by Foreign Guardians due to Cultural Differences
日本学校的文化模式:外国监护人因文化差异而感到的不适和适应不良
  • 批准号:
    23K00621
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 资助金额:
    $ 10万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Differences in the neural recruitment for EF and mathematics by children from diverse socio-cultural contexts
来自不同社会文化背景的儿童在 EF 和数学方面的神经募集差异
  • 批准号:
    2879597
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 资助金额:
    $ 10万
  • 项目类别:
    Studentship
NSF-BSF: HCC: Cultural Differences in Pedestrian-Autonomous Vehicle Interaction
NSF-BSF:HCC:行人与自动驾驶车辆交互中的文化差异
  • 批准号:
    2212431
  • 财政年份:
    2022
  • 资助金额:
    $ 10万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
HCC: Medium: Cultural Differences in Driving Interaction
HCC:媒介:驾驶互动中的文化差异
  • 批准号:
    2107111
  • 财政年份:
    2021
  • 资助金额:
    $ 10万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
A Q-methodology international multiphase study exploring cultural differences in the understanding of professionalism and leadership in medical education comparing Japanese and UK contexts
Q-方法国际多阶段研究比较日本和英国背景,探讨医学教育专业精神和领导力理解方面的文化差异
  • 批准号:
    21K10377
  • 财政年份:
    2021
  • 资助金额:
    $ 10万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Investigation of Sustainable Cultural Landscape Factors and Creation of Modern Rationality Explored from Historical Changes and Regional Differences in Plant Utilization
从植物利用的历史变迁和地域差异探寻可持续文化景观因素及现代理性创造
  • 批准号:
    21K12386
  • 财政年份:
    2021
  • 资助金额:
    $ 10万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Cultural differences in moral development and parent-child transference: A cognitive neuroscience approach
道德发展和亲子移情的文化差异:认知神经科学方法
  • 批准号:
    21H00939
  • 财政年份:
    2021
  • 资助金额:
    $ 10万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
Religious moral reasoning in the frame of dual process approach: Cultural differences in religious moral reasoning and thinking style.
双过程方法框架下的宗教道德推理:宗教道德推理和思维方式的文化差异
  • 批准号:
    21KK0042
  • 财政年份:
    2021
  • 资助金额:
    $ 10万
  • 项目类别:
    Fund for the Promotion of Joint International Research (Fostering Joint International Research (B))
Re-interpretation of language learning anxiety based on the cultural differences
基于文化差异的语言学习焦虑重新解读
  • 批准号:
    20K00875
  • 财政年份:
    2020
  • 资助金额:
    $ 10万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
{{ showInfoDetail.title }}

作者:{{ showInfoDetail.author }}

知道了