权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Freedom - Morality- Politics: Practical Philosophy after Kant (1785-1800)

自由 - 道德 - 政治：康德之后的实践哲学（1785-1800）

基本信息

批准号：
411370158
负责人：
Privatdozent Dr. Jörg Noller
金额：
--
依托单位：
Lehrstuhl Philosophie mit Schwerpunkt Ethik
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Scientific Networks
财政年份：
2018
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2017-12-31 至 2021-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/411370158?language=en
关键词：
Freedom Morality Politics Practical Philosophy

项目摘要

Contrary to the theoretical debate after Kant’s 'Critique of Pure Reason', the practical debate after Kant’s 'Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals' and his 'Critique of Practical Reason' has been neglected in scholarship. However, it is especially by modification and transformation of Kant’s practical philosophy that the main ideas of many major philosophers of German Idealism evolved. The research network aims at reconstructing this practical debate both historically and systematically. It aims at analyzing important contributions to this debate by lesser-known philosophers such as Johann Heinrich Abicht, Christoph Gottfried Bardili, Friedrich Ludewig Bouterweck, Leonhard Creuzer, Johann Friedrich Flatt, Karl Heinrich Heydenreich, Ludwig Heinrich Jakob, Hermann Andreas Pistorius, August Wilhelm Rehberg, Carl Christian Erhard Schmid, Gottlob Ernst Schulze, Christian Wilhelm Snell and Johann August Heinrich Ulrich, but also better known thinkers such as Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, Salomon Maimon, Karl Leonhard Reinhold, Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Friedrich Schiller, the early Hegel and Schelling.The network aims at reconstructing the following three dimensions of the practical debate:(1) Practical freedom and moral imputability:After Kant’s first and second Critique, there arose an intensive debate on how to conceive of freedom of the will given the entire determination of the world by the laws of nature so that the individual imputability of the moral agent can be preserved.(2) Foundation of morality and moral motivation:Here the question arises of how morality can be founded and cognized by pure reason. Also, the debate deals with the question of which kind of moral incentive be most adequate to the specific human condition – be it respect, love or compassion.(3) Political philosophy and philosophy of right:This debate focused on the question of how free agents interact in societies and states according to moral and juridical laws. Also, the debate is interested in the question of how morality and right depend on each other, and how they can be deduced from practical reason.

与康德《纯粹理性批判》之后的理论论争相反，康德《道德形而上学的基础》和《实践理性批判》之后的实践论争在学术界一直被忽视。然而，正是通过对康德实践哲学的修正和改造，德国唯心主义的许多主要哲学家的主要思想才得以发展。该研究网络旨在从历史上和系统地重建这一实际辩论。它旨在分析一些不太知名的哲学家对这场辩论的重要贡献，如约翰·海因里希·阿比希特、克里斯托弗·戈特弗里德·巴迪利、弗里德里希·路德维希·鲍特威克、莱昂哈德·克罗伊泽、约翰·弗里德里希·弗拉特、卡尔·海因里希·海登赖希、路德维希·海因里希·雅各布、赫尔曼·安德烈亚斯·皮斯托瑞斯、奥古斯特·威廉·斯佩克特贝格、卡尔·克里斯蒂安·埃哈德·施密德、戈特罗布·恩斯特·舒尔茨、克里斯蒂安·威廉·斯内尔和约翰·奥古斯特·海因里希·乌尔里希，同时也包括著名的思想家，如弗里德里希·海因里希·雅可比、所罗门·梅蒙、卡尔·莱因霍尔德、约翰·戈特利布·费希特、弗里德里希·席勒、早期黑格尔和谢林。该网络旨在重建实践辩论的以下三个维度：（1）实践自由和道德可归责性：在康德的第一次和第二次批判之后，在自然法则决定世界的情况下，如何设想意志自由，从而使道德主体的个人责任可以保存。(2)道德的基础和道德动机：这里出现的问题是，道德如何被建立和认知的纯粹理性。此外，辩论涉及的问题，哪种道德激励是最适当的具体人类条件-是尊重，爱或同情。(3)政治哲学和权利哲学：这场辩论集中在自由主体如何根据道德和法律在社会和国家中相互作用的问题上。此外，辩论感兴趣的问题是道德和权利如何相互依赖，以及如何从实践理性中推导出来。