Comparative Study of the Otherness of lndigenous peoples in Latin America

拉丁美洲土著民族差异性的比较研究

• 批准号: 05451087
• 负责人: KIMURA Eiichi
• 金额: $ 1.86万
• 依托单位: Kobe City University of Foreign Studies
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (B)
• 财政年份: 1993
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1993 至 1994
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-05451087/
• 关键词: Indigenous Pople; Otherness; Indigenismo; National Society; Natinalism; Disnationalization; Ethnocentrism; Ladinization; インディオ; 脱国民; 語る偶像; ラディーノ; クリオーリョ; 政治参加; 神話; 世界観; エスノセントリズム

Our project aimed to clarify the paradigms of "otherness" in contemporary Latin America, analyzing the so-called "indigenist" narratives, political process and movement indigenous peoples. We had paid much attention to the otherness of the indigenous peoples in national societyKimura makes clear that the works of Rosario Castellanos, female novelist of mexican indigenist group, make an epoch in histroy of Latin American indigenist narratives. In comparision with works the Andian indigenists that had been devoted to discribe the collective mentality of indigenous peoples, she had made effort to discribe the personal peculiarity of indigenous peoples. Kobayashi analyzes discourses about the indigenous revolt in Chiapas broked out in 1994 and points out that various explanations of the outsider presense in the revolt are similiar to those of the "Cast Wars" in the 19th century, in which emphasize the rational defect of indigenous peoples who never could coordinate well organized revolts. Yoshimori analyze the models of democracy in the national formation of Uruguay and Guatemala, and points out that the "disnationalized sector" had monopolized the model of democratic nation that excludes great mayority of people, that is, indigenous peoples.Our project reveals that there remains many themes to be discussed, such as indigenous strategy for survival in national society

我们的项目旨在澄清当代拉丁美洲的“异类”范式，分析所谓的“原住民”叙事、政治进程和原住民运动。我们非常关注民族社会中原住民的异性。木村明确表示，墨西哥原住民群体女性小说家罗萨里奥·卡斯特拉诺斯的作品在拉丁美洲原住民叙事史上开创了一个新纪元。与安迪亚原住民的作品致力于描写原住民的集体心态相比，她着力描写原住民的个人特质。小林分析了1994年恰帕斯州爆发的土著起义的话语，指出对起义中外来者存在的各种解释与19世纪的“卡斯特战争”相似，强调了土著人民永远无法协调组织良好的起义的理性缺陷。吉森分析了乌拉圭和危地马拉的国家形成过程中的民主模式，指出“非国家化部门”垄断了排除大多数人即原住民的民主国家模式。我们的项目揭示了仍有许多主题有待讨论，例如原住民在国家社会中的生存策略

项目成果

KOBAYASHI,Munehiro: "Indigenous Movement in CHiapas, Mexico (11)"" Kobe City University Journal. 45-5. (1994)

小林宗宏：“墨西哥恰帕斯州的土著运动（11）””神户市立大学学报。45-5。（1994）

小林致広: "チアパスにおける先住民運動(II)" 神戸外大論叢. 45-5. 38-62 (1994)

小林道宏：“恰帕斯州的土著运动（II）”神户外龙系列45-5（1994）。

KOBAYASHI,Munehiro: "Modalidades de la vida indigena texcocanos en la decada de 1530 (in press)" Annals of Latin American Studies. 15. 19-52 (1995)

小林宗弘：“Modalidades de la vida indigena texcocanos en la decada de 1530（印刷中）”《拉丁美洲研究年鉴》。

小林致広: "チアパスにおける先住民運動(I)" 神戸外大論叢. 45-2. (1994)

小林道宏：“恰帕斯州的土著运动（I）”神户外龙系列（1994）。

小林致広: "チアパスにおける先住民運動(II)" 神戸外大論叢. 45-. (1994)

小林道宏：“恰帕斯州的土著运动（II）”神户外龙系列（1994）。