Comparative Study of the Otherness of lndigenous peoples in Latin America

拉丁美洲土著民族差异性的比较研究

• 批准号: 05451087
• 负责人: KIMURA Eiichi
• 金额: $ 1.86万
• 依托单位: Kobe City University of Foreign Studies
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (B)
• 财政年份: 1993
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1993 至 1994
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-05451087/
• 关键词: Indigenous Pople; Otherness; Indigenismo; National Society; Natinalism; Disnationalization; Ethnocentrism; Ladinization; インディオ; 脱国民; 語る偶像; ラディーノ; クリオーリョ; 政治参加; 神話; 世界観; エスノセントリズム

Our project aimed to clarify the paradigms of "otherness" in contemporary Latin America, analyzing the so-called "indigenist" narratives, political process and movement indigenous peoples. We had paid much attention to the otherness of the indigenous peoples in national societyKimura makes clear that the works of Rosario Castellanos, female novelist of mexican indigenist group, make an epoch in histroy of Latin American indigenist narratives. In comparision with works the Andian indigenists that had been devoted to discribe the collective mentality of indigenous peoples, she had made effort to discribe the personal peculiarity of indigenous peoples. Kobayashi analyzes discourses about the indigenous revolt in Chiapas broked out in 1994 and points out that various explanations of the outsider presense in the revolt are similiar to those of the "Cast Wars" in the 19th century, in which emphasize the rational defect of indigenous peoples who never could coordinate well organized revolts. Yoshimori analyze the models of democracy in the national formation of Uruguay and Guatemala, and points out that the "disnationalized sector" had monopolized the model of democratic nation that excludes great mayority of people, that is, indigenous peoples.Our project reveals that there remains many themes to be discussed, such as indigenous strategy for survival in national society

我们的项目旨在澄清当代拉丁美洲“他者”的范式，分析所谓的“土著”叙事、政治进程和土著人民的运动。我们非常关注土著民族在国家社会中的差异性木村明确指出，墨西哥土著群体的女小说家罗萨里奥·卡斯特拉诺斯的作品在拉丁美洲土著叙事史上开辟了一个时代。与致力于描述土著人民集体心理的安迪亚土著作家的作品相比，她努力描述土著人民的个人特点。小林分析了1994年斡旋出来的关于恰帕斯土著起义的话语，并指出对起义中的外来者存在的各种解释类似于19世纪的《铸造战争》，强调了土著人民的理性缺陷，他们永远无法协调好有组织的起义。吉森分析了乌拉圭和危地马拉国家形成过程中的民主模式，指出非国有化的部门垄断了民主国家的模式，排斥了大多数人，即土著人民。我们的项目揭示了许多主题仍有待讨论，如国家社会中的土著生存战略

项目成果

KOBAYASHI,Munehiro: "Indigenous Movement in CHiapas, Mexico (11)"" Kobe City University Journal. 45-5. (1994)

小林宗宏：“墨西哥恰帕斯州的土著运动（11）””神户市立大学学报。45-5。（1994）

小林致広: "チアパスにおける先住民運動(II)" 神戸外大論叢. 45-5. 38-62 (1994)

小林道宏：“恰帕斯州的土著运动（II）”神户外龙系列45-5（1994）。

KOBAYASHI,Munehiro: "Modalidades de la vida indigena texcocanos en la decada de 1530 (in press)" Annals of Latin American Studies. 15. 19-52 (1995)

小林宗弘：“Modalidades de la vida indigena texcocanos en la decada de 1530（印刷中）”《拉丁美洲研究年鉴》。

小林致広: "チアパスにおける先住民運動(I)" 神戸外大論叢. 45-2. (1994)

小林道宏：“恰帕斯州的土著运动（I）”神户外龙系列（1994）。

小林致広: "チアパスにおける先住民運動(II)" 神戸外大論叢. 45-. (1994)

小林道宏：“恰帕斯州的土著运动（II）”神户外龙系列（1994）。