A Fundamental Study of Philosophy of Language in Early Navay-nyaya

早期Navay-nyaya语言哲学的基础研究

基本信息

批准号：
15520047
负责人：
WADA Toshihiro
金额：
$ 2.3万
依托单位：
Nagoya University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2003
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2003 至 2005
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

This project has three achievements : (1) Clarification of a Navya-nyaya feature, (2) Clarification of the Navya-nyaya principle of determining the meaning of words, and (3) a translation and analysis of the beginning part of the Verbal Suffix Section of the Language Chapter of Gangesa's Tattvacintamani. On the first achievement : Reviewing major preceding research of the Navya-nyaya feature, I have pointed out its shortcomings and have offered a new perspective in finding the feature : interpreting the Navya-nyaya description and analysis from a view point of "relation". In other words, Navya-nyaya describes its analysis in terms of relation and develops its terminology for this task. This feature can be traced back to Udayana in the 11^<th> century. This achievement is presented in the first paper given in the list of references on the back of this page. On the second achievement : I have pointed out that there are seven or eight methods of determining the meaning of words in early N … More avya-nyaya, and that when these methods do not hold good, Gengesa presents for the meaning determination the method of relating the meaning to a universal, which is a real entity for Navya-nyaya authors. If the analyzer fails in relating the meaning to a universal, such a meaning is proved inappropriate. Later Navya-nyaya authors employ the concept of avacchedaka (delimitor) to examine whether the meaning is related to a universal or not, which implies that Gangesa's method survives to the modern times. This achievement is presented in the second paper given in the list of the back references. On the third achievement : I have translated into English with annotation one fourth of the Verbal Suffix Section, which presents the general Navya-nyaya view of on the meaning of finite verbal suffixes and the Mimamsa objection to it. The translated portion shows to a great deal Gangesa's parallel discussion with that in Udayana's Nyayakusumanjali. This achievement is presented in the third paper given in the list of the back references. Less

该项目具有三个成就：（1）澄清navya-nyaya特征，（2）确定单词含义的navya-nyaya原则，以及（3）gangesa tattvacintamani语言章节的开始部分的翻译和分析。关于第一个成就：回顾Navya-nyaya功能的主要研究，我指出了它的缺点，并提供了一个新的观点来查找该功能：从“关系”的角度来解释Navya-Nyaya的描述和分析。换句话说，Navya-Nyaya在关系和发展方面描述了其在此任务的术语方面的分析。该功能可以追溯到11^<th>世纪的Udayana。该成就在此页面背面的参考列表中给出的第一篇论文中介绍了这一成就。在第二个成就上：我指出的是，在n…早期……更多的avya-nyaya中，有七个或八种方法来确定单词的含义，而当这些方法不能保持良好状态时，gengesa提出了确定含义与通用的方法的含义，这是navya-nyaya-navya-nyaya-authors的真实实体。如果分析仪无法将含义与通用联系起来，则证明这种含义是不合适的。后来的Navya-Nyaya作者采用了Avacchedaka（定界符）的概念来检查含义是否与通用的含义有关，这意味着Gangesa的方法与现代相关。这项成就在背面参考列表中的第二篇论文中提出。关于第三个成就：我已经翻译成英文，注释是口头后缀部分的四分之一，这对有限的口头后缀和mimamsa对此的意义提出了一般的navya-nyaya观点。翻译的部分表明了Gangesa在Udayana的Nyayakusumanjali中进行了很大的平行讨论。这项成就是在背部参考列表中的第三篇论文中提出的。较少的