State and Happiness. On the Critique of the New Eudaimonism in Political Philosophy and Publicity.

在政治公共领域，也在政治哲学领域，经验幸福感研究的结果正受到越来越多的关注。一方面，这是可以理解的，因为评估国家措施对公民的福祉和幸福有什么影响是很重要的。另一方面，对国家、法律和政治的理解因此获得了一种利己主义的特征，这可能与自由秩序的基本原则发生冲突。本文将从法哲学的角度对这种张力进行分析。为此，将考察在不同行动领域使用幸福研究结果的个别例子，以便能够最终评估这些结果在自由秩序的政治中可以发挥什么作用。

In the political public sphere, but also in political philosophy, the results of empirical happiness research are attracting ever greater attention. On the one hand, this is understandable, because it is important for the evaluation of state measures what effects they have on the well-being and happiness of the citizens. On the other hand, the understanding of the state, law, and politics thereby acquires a eudaimonistic character that could come into tension with the basic principles of a liberal order. This tension will be analyzed here from the perspective of the philosophy of law. To this end, individual examples of the use of the results of happiness research in different fields of action will be examined in order to be able to finally assess what role these results can play in the politics of a liberal order.