1950S JAPANESE REORGANIZATION OF THE SYSTEM OF LOCAL BOARD OF EDCATION

20世纪50年代日本地方教育委员会系统的重组

• 批准号: 11610304
• 负责人: HONDA Masato
• 金额: $ 2.18万
• 依托单位: National Institute for Educational Policy Research
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1999
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1999 至 2000
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-11610304/
• 关键词: educational administration; board of education; educational policy; politics of education; 教育政策; 地方自治; 教育行政; 地方教育行政法

First of all, transitions of words and phrases concerning a financial authority of the board of education in sime versions of drafts of the "Law on the Organization and Operation of Local Educational Administration of 1956"(the new law)were analyzed.This research clarified that Ministry of Education struggled for keeping the local board of education against Ministry of Home Affairs when they were requested to revised the "Law on the Board of Education of 1948"(the old law). By now, there was no consideration based on these internal materials. We arranged and reproduce them on the final report in order to open them to the public. Most researchers explain the discontinuity between the old law and the new law. But in this studay the main stress falls on the continuity. Next, we interviewed two key persons, Messrs. Suzuki and Kida, Suzuki was the undersecretary of Ministry of Home Affairs and Kida was director of Ministry of Education then. Our insistence was proven by this interview.Finally, the action and the plan of education pressure groups such as Japan Teacher's Union, and local related pressure groups such as the Town and Village Associations, and political parties such as Liberal Party, or Democratic Party, were arranged. We can say many actors competed for maximizing their interest. When we explain and interpretation the process of revision of the old law, we should notice that the pluralism approach is useful for this case.

首先，我想说的是，《1956年地方教育行政管理组织和运作法》草案中有关教育委员会财政权力的词语转换本研究澄清了教育部在要求地方教育委员会修改《教育法》时，为使地方教育委员会与内政部保持对立而进行的斗争。1948年《教育委员会法》（旧法）。到了现在，已经没有根据这些内部资料进行考量了。我们在最后报告中整理并转载了这些内容，以便向公众开放。大多数研究者解释了新旧法律之间的不连续性。但在本研究中，主要的重点福尔斯落在连续性上。接下来，我们采访了两个关键人物，铃木先生和木田先生，铃木先生当时是内政部副部长，木田先生当时是教育部部长。这次访问证明了我们的坚持。最后，安排了日本教师联盟等教育压力团体、町村协会等地方相关压力团体、自由党、民主党等政党的行动和计划。我们可以说，许多参与者都在为自己的利益最大化而竞争。当我们解释和解释旧法的修改过程时，我们应该注意到多元主义的方法对本案是有用的。