Formation, Development and Transformation of the Modern Law - Comparative Studies of Europe, China and Japan -

现代法的形成、发展与变迁 - 欧洲、中国和日本的比较研究 -

基本信息

批准号：
11620009
负责人：
MIZUBAYASHI Takeshi
金额：
$ 2.37万
依托单位：
Tokyo Metropolitan University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1999
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1999 至 2000
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

Hideo SHINPOU demonstrates that in the absolutism period the nature of the forms of law consists in a diversity of source of law and integration by a monarch, and the purpose of monarchal legislation is found in generalization and direct control over the individual, based on the status system. The early modern times show therefore not only peculiarity as an individual time, but also continuity with modern times.Naoki KANAYAMA point out that the characteristic of the modern law consists in its "civil" nature, and law "civilised" becomes a comprehensive norm, by which people's life is controled in its very details.Seigo HIROWATARI focused on two aspects of the problem "Nationalsocialism and Modernization". How or whether did the Nationalsocialism modernize the German Society? How did the Nationalsocialism attack the keyconcepts of Modern Law and with what did the Nationalsocialism replaced it ? This Analysis showed the interdependent relation between normative and factual aspects of modernization.Hiroaki TERADA pointed out that the Q'ing civil justice have a strong inclination for compromise, and it was not as the result of the static society, but as an another style of the public authority governing the dynamic societyFumio JINBO demonstrated that the modern civil litigation system was not quite different from that of Tokugawa Era, but the base which made it possible to receive modern Western law after Meiji Era has been already formed in the practices of money suits in the Osaka Town Magistrate's Office.

Hideo Shinpou证明，在专制时期，法律形式的性质包括君主的多种法律和融合，君主立法的目的是基于身份系统的概括和对个人的直接控制。因此，近代早期表明，不仅是个人时代的特殊性，而且与现代时代的连续性。民族社会主义如何或是否现代化德国社会？民族社会主义是如何攻击现代法律的关键概念，而民族社会主义取代了什么？这项分析表明，现代化的规范和事实方面之间的相互依存关系。HiroakiTerada指出，Q'公民正义对妥协有着强烈的倾向，而不是静态社会的结果，而是静态社会的一种风格，而是一种公共权威，作为一种动态社会的态度表明，与现代诉讼相比，这与现代诉讼并不是与众不同的是，这使得与之相同，但与众不同的是，这是一个与众不同的事物。明治时代之后的现代西方法律已经在大阪镇治安官办公室的货币诉讼实践中形成。