权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Formation, Development and Transformation of the Modern Law - Comparative Studies of Europe, China and Japan -

现代法的形成、发展与变迁 - 欧洲、中国和日本的比较研究 -

基本信息

批准号：
11620009
负责人：
MIZUBAYASHI Takeshi
金额：
$ 2.37万
依托单位：
Tokyo Metropolitan University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1999
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1999 至 2000
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

Hideo SHINPOU demonstrates that in the absolutism period the nature of the forms of law consists in a diversity of source of law and integration by a monarch, and the purpose of monarchal legislation is found in generalization and direct control over the individual, based on the status system. The early modern times show therefore not only peculiarity as an individual time, but also continuity with modern times.Naoki KANAYAMA point out that the characteristic of the modern law consists in its "civil" nature, and law "civilised" becomes a comprehensive norm, by which people's life is controled in its very details.Seigo HIROWATARI focused on two aspects of the problem "Nationalsocialism and Modernization". How or whether did the Nationalsocialism modernize the German Society? How did the Nationalsocialism attack the keyconcepts of Modern Law and with what did the Nationalsocialism replaced it ? This Analysis showed the interdependent relation between normative and factual aspects of modernization.Hiroaki TERADA pointed out that the Q'ing civil justice have a strong inclination for compromise, and it was not as the result of the static society, but as an another style of the public authority governing the dynamic societyFumio JINBO demonstrated that the modern civil litigation system was not quite different from that of Tokugawa Era, but the base which made it possible to receive modern Western law after Meiji Era has been already formed in the practices of money suits in the Osaka Town Magistrate's Office.

神佛秀雄论证了专制主义时期法律形式的本质在于法源的多样性和君主的一体化，君主立法的目的在于以身份制度为基础的普遍化和对个人的直接控制。因此，近代早期不仅表现出作为一个单独的时代的特殊性，而且与近代具有连续性。金山直树指出，近代法律的特征在于其“市民”性质，法律的“市民化”成为一种综合性规范，它控制着人们生活的各个细节。国家社会主义如何或是否使德国社会现代化？国家社会主义是如何攻击现代法的核心概念的？国家社会主义又用什么来取代现代法的核心概念？寺田宏明指出，清代民事司法具有强烈的妥协倾向，这不是静态社会的结果，而是作为公共权力统治动态社会的另一种形式。神保文雄论证了近代民事诉讼制度与德川时代的民事诉讼制度并无太大区别，但明治以后接受近代西方法律的基础，已经在大坂府的金钱诉讼实践中形成。