Comparative study on school choice system of pubfic elementary and middle schools' in the USA and Japan

美国、日本公立中小学择校制度比较研究

• 批准号: 12610245
• 负责人: HAYO Masaaki
• 金额: $ 1.47万
• 依托单位: TOKYO GAKUGEI UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2000
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2000 至 2001
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-12610245/
• 关键词: school zone; school choice; school feeder pattern; alternative school; magnet schcool; VEEP; trends of the adoption of school choice system,in Japan; meaning of school district in Japan; 学区内学校選択; 東京都品川区の学校選択制; 自由通学区域制; サンディエゴ統一学区; 区域外就学; 学校選択

This study has the intention of clarifying the structure and function of school choice system of public elementary and middle schools in two school districts in the U.S.A. and Japan.Shinagawa district in Tokyo was chosen as the case of Japan, and San Diego unified school district in California was chosen as the case of the U.S.A.The research results were as follows:(1)The pattems of school dnoice system could be catecprized in similar way in both countries as follows.1 open enrollment within whole areas of school district by abollshing school zone2 open enrollment within whole areas of school district by keeping school zones as far3 restricted school choice by breaking down school district into some areas4 restricted school choice among neighboring schools5 restricted school choice within limited areas of school zones so far,6 open enrollment within whole area of school district limited to particular schools(2) The school choice system in San Diego united school dfetrict has introduced … More 2 and 6 patterns of (1), in the other hand that of Shinagawa cfetrict system has introduced 2 and 3 patterns above.(3) If we have analyzed the function of school choice system in two districts, we could find out compensatory mechanism of school choice system in the case of San Diego mified school district that is school feeder pattern.(4) School feeder pattern could be used as a toot for hdrviduaization of education and as a network of Professional Development School project as well, as we could find cut the case in City Heights Project in downtown san diego by san diego state university.(5) The percentage of municipalities in which school choice system has been introokiced or has been under examination for the introduction of it is about 19 % in elementary schools and 16% in middle schools in Japan.If we consider the fact that about 50% of municipalities in Japan are in the situation of having only one or two elementary schools and one middle school, the number shows that about half of the municipalities in Japan in which the probability of introducing school choice system exists have introduced it or have been under consideration of introducing it. Less

本研究旨在厘清美国和日本两个学区公立中小学择校制度的结构与功能。研究结果表明：(1)两国的学区制模式是相似的：1、取消学区制，实现全区开放招生；2、保持学区化，实现全区开放招生；3、将学区拆分成若干区域，限制择校；4、在相邻校区中限制择校；5、到目前为止，在有限的学区范围内，限制择校。6在整个学区范围内仅限于特定学校的公开招生(2)圣地亚哥联合学校的择校制度引入了…比较了(1)的2种和6种模式，另一方面品川分校制度引入了上述2种和3种模式。(3)通过对两个学区择校制度功能的分析，可以发现圣地亚哥混合学区择校制度的补偿机制是一种补给模式。(4)补给模式既可以作为教育民主化的标志，也可以作为专业发展学校项目的网络。如圣地亚哥州立大学在圣地亚哥市中心的城市高地项目中所发现的那样。(5)日本已经引入或正在考虑引入择校制度的市政当局的比例约为19%的小学和16%的中学。如果我们考虑到日本约50%的市政当局只有一所或两所小学和一所中学的情况，这一数字表明，在日本存在引入择校制度的可能性的市政当局中，约有一半已经引入或正在考虑引入它。较少

项目成果

葉養正明: "学校選択・通学区域の弾力化"日本教育経営学会紀要. 44巻. (2002)

Masaaki Hayo：“学校选择和入学区域的灵活性”日本教育管理学会公告第 44 卷（2002 年）。

葉養正明: "学校選択・通学区域の弾力化"日本教育経営学会紀要. 44号. (2002)

Masaaki Hayo：“学校选择和入学区域的灵活性”日本教育管理学会公告第44号。（2002年）

Masaaki Hayo: "Flexible management of school zone system and school choice system"The journal of educational administration Society. Vol.44. (2002)

早阳正明：《学区制度与择校制度的灵活管理》教育行政学会会刊。