权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

The legal education for the base of judicial reform and the role of public law curriculums

司法改革基础的法学教育及公法课程的作用

基本信息

批准号：
12620017
负责人：
KISA Shigeo
金额：
$ 1.66万
依托单位：
KYUSHU UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2000
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2000 至 2001
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-12620017/
关键词：
law education rule of law practical education jurisprudence Germany practical learning public law 司法改革法的思考法的行動ロー・スクール

项目摘要

Currently in Japan voices demanding judicial reform can be heard everywhere. In order to make such reform successful, however, I believe that enhancement of legal consciousness among Japanese has to be achieved.Otherwise the old methods of negotiation such as ground-making or unanimous open agreement will be used continuously that, in effect, undermine the real reform. Considering this, two years ago, I have set the goal of my studies to find what had to be done to enhance the legal education in Japan.I have visited Germany two times to observe the actual legal-study classes in vocational schools, exchanged views with the officials in charge of law education in the local governments. Further, I met many other people in Germany who were working at the front line of legal education including the Deputy Principle of The Law Gymnasium, law scholars and concerned citizens to learn their views on legal education. These opportunities helped me broaden and deepen my thinking about the issues.I … More made a comparison of the education systems and the law textbooks between the two countries. Such comparison suggests the serious insufficiency, both time and quality wise, in the Japanese legal education system.Neverthless, I would say that the same insufficiency indicates what has to be done to improve the system.One improvement I recommend is, like Germany, to create written Guidelines for Legal Education. I have obtained sample guidelines and literature used in Germany. In Japan, overall education has been loosened for some time; teaching time has been shortened, and curriculums were decreased. It has been characterized as the "relaxation of education". Even at the university level, emphasis on more the practical side of learning isdemanded. Yet, not many Japanese have a clear idea about how efficiently such practical education could be implemented. For example, the textbooks actually being used in universities to teach public law do not explain how to create and implement public law in a real setting.Given the above, I believe that to figure out how to create proper textbooks and develop new curriculums, in addition to recruiting a new bred of professors will be the next step to be taken to improve legal education in Japan. Less

目前，在日本到处都能听到要求司法改革的声音。然而，为了使这种改革取得成功，我认为必须提高日本人的法律意识。否则，将继续使用诸如奠基或一致公开协议等旧的谈判方法，这实际上破坏了真正的改革。考虑到这一点，我在两年前就设定了自己的学习目标，想要找到提高日本法律教育的方法。我曾两次赴德国实地考察职业学校的法律学习班，并与德国地方政府负责法律教育的官员进行交流。此外，我还会见了许多在德国工作在法律教育第一线的人，包括the Law Gymnasium的副校长、法律学者和关心法律教育的市民，了解他们对法律教育的看法。这些机会帮助我拓宽和深化了对问题的思考。我比较了两国的教育制度和法律教科书。这样的比较表明，日本法律教育系统在时间和质量上都存在严重不足。然而，我想说的是，同样的不足表明了必须做些什么来改进这个系统。我建议的一个改进是，像德国一样，制定书面的法律教育指导方针。我已经获得了在德国使用的指南样本和文献。在日本，整体教育宽松已经有一段时间了；缩短了教学时间，减少了课程设置。它被描述为“教育的放松”。即使在大学阶段，也需要更多地强调学习的实践方面。然而，对于如何有效地实施这种实践教育，没有多少日本人有明确的想法。例如，大学实际使用的公法教材并没有解释如何在现实环境中创建和实施公法。综上所述，我认为，除了聘请新一代的教授之外，如何制作合适的教科书和开发新的课程将是改善日本法律教育的下一步。少