Development of Instructional Evaluation Sheet and Revision Strategy Guidebook based on ARCS Motivational Model

在这项研究中，开发了工具来评估和发现教学的动机问题，并促进修改过程。在约翰·M·凯勒提出的ARCS动机模型的基础上，设计了一份评价表，对ARCS的四个类别中的每一个都有四个问题：关注度、相关性、信心和满意度。几所大学的学生参与了对他们参加的大学讲座进行评估的试验研究。进行因素分析，确定信度和效度，最终确定ARCS动机评价表。然后开发了基于网络的ARCS动机评价表，由学生进行评估，并对数据进行统计分析。检查了可用性和实用性，并进行了修改。另一方面，收集了在教育环境的各个领域提出的激励策略，并将其归类为ARCS修订策略指南的形式。然后，通过将基于网络的ARCS评估表和ARCS修订策略集合相结合，开发了一本基于Web的ARCS动机修订指南。该系统经过设计，以便在调查问卷中学生反应较弱的领域提出候选人策略。测试了可用性和实用性，并进行了修改。这项研究的所有上述结果都通过首席研究员的网站公开。

In this study, tools were developed to evaluate and find motivational problems of instruction, and to facilitate revision processes. Based on the ARCS motivational model, proposed by John M.Keller, an evaluation sheet was designed that has four question items for each of the ARCS four categories : Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction. Students of several universities participated in trial studies of evaluating university lectures that they took. Factor analyses were conducted and reliability and validity were confirmed, in order to finalize the ARCS motivation evaluation sheet. A Web-based ARCS motivation evaluation sheet was then developed to conduct evaluation by students and to analyze the data statistically. Usability and practicality were checked and revisions were made. On the other hand, motivational strategies that had been proposed in various areas of educational settings were collected and classified in a form of an ARCS revision strategy guidebook. A Web-based ARCS motivational revision guidebook was then developed, by combining the Web-based ARCS evaluation sheet and the collection of ARCS revision strategies. The system was deigned so that candidate strategies were proposed in those areas that had weak reactions by students in the questionnaire. Usability and practicality were tested and revisions were made. All the above outcomes of this-study were made public through the Head investigator's Web site.