AN "ISAGOGIC" COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE ETYMOLOGICAL DICTIONARY IN THE ROMANCE LEXICOGRAPHY

本研究的目的是比较罗曼语词典编纂学《罗马语词源词典》中三部经得起词源学科学批评的词典（《罗曼语词源词典》）由弗里德里希·迭斯于1853年^[1]; 1861年^[2]; 1869- 70年^[3]; 1878年^[5]在波恩出版。1887^5年，《晚罗马书》（拉丁-罗曼语词典）古斯塔夫·科尔廷于1890- 1991年^1; 1901年^2在帕德博恩出版; 1907年^[3]和《罗马语源学》（《罗曼语源词典》）由威廉·迈耶-吕布克于1911-20^1; 1924^2; 1930-35^3; 1968^4; 1972^5年在海德堡出版。1992 ^[6]，并对这些词典进行了比较。说是二版与第一版相同，四、五、六版与三版相同。在本研究中，我们将《迈耶-吕布克词典》的第一版和第二版称为A版。发现两个版本的《迈耶-吕布克罗曼语源词典》在词源解释方面存在较大差异。例如，版本A的引理“^*aballinca”已经被修改为版本B的引理“^*melanca，melenca”。

The aim of this study is to compare three dictionaries that can endure scientific criticism on etymology in the Romance lexicography, Etymologisches Woerterbuch der romanischen Sprachen (Etymological Dictionary of the Romance Languages) by Friedrich Diez published in Bonn in 1853^1; 1861^2; 1869-70^3; 1878^5; 1887^5, Lateinisch-romanisches Woerterbuch (Latin-Romance Dictionary) by Gustav Koerting published in Paderborn in 1890-91^1 ; 1901^2 ; 1907^3 and Romanisches etymologisches Woerterbuch (Romance Etymological Dictionary) by Wilhelm Meyer-Luebke published in Heidelberg in 1911-20^1; 1924^2; 1930-35^3; 1968^4; 1972^5; 1992^6, and to present the result of comparing these dictionaries.The main focus of this research is to compare each version of the Meyer-Luebke's Romance Etymological Dictionary. It is said that the second edition is the same as the first, and that the forth, the fifth and the sixth editions are the same as the third edition. In this research, for the Meyer-Luebke's Dictionary we call the first and second editions a version A. the rest a version B.It was found that two versions of the Meyer-Luebke's Romance Etymological Dictionary are quite different with respect to the etymological interpretation. For example, the lemma "^*aballinca" of the version A has been modified to the lemma "^*melanca, melenca" of the version B.