Longitudinal Study of Young People (LSYPE) data linkage
Longitudinal Study of Young People (LSYPE) data linkage
批准号:
ES/L000164/1
负责人:
Lisa Calderwood
金额:
$493.02万
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Research Grant
财政年份:
2013
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2013 至 --
中文摘要
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
The Longitudinal Study of Young People in England (LSYPE) was launched in 2004 with an initial sample of around 15,700 young people in year nine, and therefore aged 13 or 14. Information has been collected from the study members every year for seven years, and the most recent survey was conducted in 2012 when individuals were 19 or 20. For the first four years of the study their parents were also interviewed. The LSYPE was funded by the Department for Education (DfE) and they have used the evidence from the study to inform policy making and to help improve services for young people. For example, the decision to raise the compulsory participation age in education and training from 16 to 18 was influenced by findings from the study. It has also been widely used by academic researchers in the UK and elsewhere. The main things that have been studied are factors affecting young people's progress through school and into further or higher education, training, or work, and how this is influenced by family background and young people's aspirations and attitudes towards school. One of the strengths of the LSYPE is that it has been linked with the DfE's administrative records of all state schools and pupils - the National Pupil Database. This includes information about each school and pupil. Most importantly, it provides details of the young people's educational attainment at GCSE and A-level. Other administrative datasets have potential for research, including records about further and higher education, state benefits and earnings, hospital admissions and criminal behaviour. Linking existing LSYPE data to these administrative records would enable further useful research. It would provide information on study members at age 22/23, and into the future, without having to conduct further surveys. However, this can't be done without the permission of the study members, and it is important that they understand fully what is planned. The first step will be to re-contact the study members to ask them permission for this data linkage and for the DfE to pass on their contact details so that we can continue the study. This will be done by posting them a leaflet and consent forms, and asking them to return them. The next step will be to provide the government departments, who hold these administrative records, with the name, sex, date of birth and address of study members who agree, in order that they can find them in their records and extract the data about them. Once we have the linked data, we will prepare it for use by other researchers by creating summary variables and producing a guide to how to use the data. We will encourage the use of the data by running separate workshops for researchers interested in health, education and economic information. The data will be stored securely, and only made available to bona-fide researchers. The DfE will also pass on the contact details, of study members who agree, and we will store them in a secure address database. We can then maintain contact with the study members, and send them summaries of research findings based on the study. We hope it will be possible to survey them in the future, both to collect information which would help us to understand the linked data, and to ask for information not included in administrative sources. However, this can only be done if additional funding can be secured. The LSYPE has already provided rich information about young people's pathways through secondary school and into higher education or the labour market. However, extending the information we have about these young people will allow us to understand the outcomes of different trajectories and of family background, risky behaviours, and attitudes and aspirations. This is particularly important as this generation, born in 1989/1990, is entering young adulthood at a time when the British Government is still grappling with the consequences of a severe world recession.
期刊论文(10)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
登录
查看更多内容
'First in family': higher education choices and labour market outcomes
“家庭第一”:高等教育选择和劳动力市场结果
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Adamecz-Volgyi A]
通讯作者:
Adamecz-Volgyi A
A note on subject choice at age 14 and socio-economic inequality in access to university
关于 14 岁时的科目选择和进入大学的社会经济不平等的说明
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Anders, J]
通讯作者:
Anders, J
DOI:
10.1080/09645292.2023.2176826
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
Education Economics
影响因子:
1.2
作者:
[Adamecz A]
通讯作者:
Adamecz A
The labor market returns to "first-in-family" university graduates
劳动力市场回归“家庭第一”大学毕业生
DOI:
10.1007/s00148-022-00908-y
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
Journal of Population Economics
影响因子:
6.1
作者:
[Adamecz-Völgyi A]
通讯作者:
Adamecz-Völgyi A
Is 'First in Family' a Good Indicator for Widening University Participation?
“家庭第一”是扩大大学参与度的良好指标吗?
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Adamecz-Völgyi A]
通讯作者:
Adamecz-Völgyi A
共 7 条
CLOSER GCRF Senior Research Associate Post
-
批准号:ES/R008086/1
-
项目类别:Research Grant
-
资助金额:$38.85万
-
财政年份:2018
-
负责人:Lisa Calderwood
-
依托单位:
A UK web-based probability panel? Exploring the issues, opportunities and design considerations.
-
批准号:ES/M010031/1
-
项目类别:Research Grant
-
资助金额:$3.84万
-
财政年份:2014
-
负责人:Lisa Calderwood
-
依托单位:
国内基金
海外基金
Incentive and governance schenism study of corporate green washing behavior in China: Based on an integiated view of econfiguration of environmental authority and decoupling logic
-
批准号:--
-
项目类别:外国学者研究基金项目
-
资助金额:--
-
批准年份:2024
-
负责人:YU BYUNGJUN
-
依托单位:
A study on prototype flexible multifunctional graphene foam-based sensing grid (柔性多功能石墨烯泡沫传感网格原型研究)
-
批准号:--
-
项目类别:--
-
资助金额:20万元
-
批准年份:2020
-
负责人:SAGAR RIZWAN UR REHMAN
-
依托单位: