权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Scottish Election Study 2016

2016 年苏格兰选举研究

基本信息

批准号：
ES/N018060/1
负责人：
Ailsa Henderson
金额：
$ 60.33万
依托单位：
University of Edinburgh
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2016
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2016 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=ES%2FN018060%2F1
关键词：
Scottish Election Study 2016

项目摘要

In May 2016 Scottish residents aged 16+ will vote in the fifth election to the Scottish Parliament. This takes place a year after the UK General Election in which the SNP won all but three Scottish seats, and 20 months after a referendum in which support for independence rose to 45%, a figure surpassed in some recent polls. This election provide an opportunity to explore long-term electoral realignment in Scottish politics, the specific impact of the referendum, and youth electoral engagement following the extension of the franchise. In addition we will address more habitual concerns about the impact of campaigning or opinion polls and the predictors of vote choice.We will conduct an online survey before the election to identify the factors influencing vote intention, and return to the same respondents in an immediate post-election survey to identify how and why people voted the way they did. Via this panel design, we can determine how intentions translate into behaviour and see how expectations influence reactions to the election result. The pre-election survey will be conducted across the last four weeks of the campaign to capture reaction to campaign events and polls. In addition, we will collect data on campaigning through a survey of party agents, interviews with party officials, and data on leader visits and campaign spending. We will also collect data on opinion polls from January 2016, tracking these alongside the campaign survey data to assess the impact of these polls.Primarily we are interested in exploring whether and how individuals decide to vote, how this process might be shaped by factors distinct from UK general elections, and also whether previous models of voting behaviour in devolved elections are still able to account for partisan preferences after the referendum. We will not only link preferences in the 2016 election to past voting behaviour in devolved and UK elections but also probe opinion on two wider issues: constitutional change in the UK (in England as well as Scotland) and the possibility of British exit from the EU. In each case, we can examine how this relates both to partisan preferences and campaign strategies in the 2016 SP elections.Throughout we will locate Scottish findings within a comparative context through our collaboration with the 2016 Welsh Election Study team, with whom we will conduct a Massive Open Online Course on the devolved elections. We will also include a core of questions from the comparative Making Electoral Democracy Work project, which to date has conducted sub-state surveys in five states . Our project will provide the first UK data for analysis within this comparative project. Our research questions, discussed in detail in the case for support, relate to contested theories of voting behaviour in elections. We focus on the extent to which voting behaviour is a function of identity, issue positions (especially on the independence question), ideology, evaluations of government performance, and leader preferences. We draw on a rich body of research on Scottish voting behaviour, much of which has been generated by previous Scottish Election Study data. We are eager to contribute to public debate and to facilitate engagement with the research process. We will hold consultation events before the survey begins, will invite academic researchers and school students to suggest survey questions, will provide the data in a format that is easy to analyse online and will employ a communications team to reach key stakeholders. Online research facilitates the quick release of research findings so that we will be able to contribute to wider debates about the election result. We will conduct briefing events and produce briefing papers as well as generate top quality academic research for journals and a monograph targeted at a top university press. We will also hold capacity building events to facilitate access to data for secondary school and university students.

2016年5月，16岁以上的苏格兰居民将参加苏格兰议会第五次选举。这发生在英国大选一年后，苏格兰民族党赢得了除三个苏格兰席位外的所有席位，20个月后，公投中独立的支持率上升到45%，这一数字在最近的一些民意调查中超过。这次选举提供了一个机会，探讨苏格兰政治的长期选举调整，全民公决的具体影响，以及延长选举权后青年的选举参与。此外，我们还将解决人们对竞选活动或民意调查的影响以及投票选择预测因素的习惯性担忧。我们将在选举前进行在线调查，以确定影响投票意向的因素，并在选举后立即进行调查，以确定人们如何以及为什么这样投票。通过这种面板设计，我们可以确定意图如何转化为行为，并了解期望如何影响对选举结果的反应。选举前调查将在竞选活动的最后四周进行，以了解对竞选活动和民意调查的反应。此外，我们还将通过对政党代理人的调查、对政党官员的采访以及关于领导人访问和竞选支出的数据来收集竞选数据。我们还将收集2016年1月以来的民意调查数据，并与竞选调查数据一起跟踪这些数据，以评估这些民意调查的影响。首先，我们有兴趣探索个人是否以及如何决定投票，这一过程如何受到英国大选不同因素的影响，以及在全民公决后，以前在权力下放选举中的投票行为模式是否仍然能够解释党派偏好。我们不仅将2016年选举中的偏好与过去在权力下放和英国选举中的投票行为联系起来，还将探讨两个更广泛问题的意见：英国（英格兰和苏格兰）的宪法改革和英国退出欧盟的可能性。在每一种情况下，我们可以研究这是如何在2016年SP选举中与党派偏好和竞选策略相关联的。在整个过程中，我们将通过与2016年威尔士选举研究团队的合作，在比较的背景下找到苏格兰的调查结果，我们将与他们一起进行关于下放选举的大规模开放式在线课程。我们还将纳入比较性“让选举民主发挥作用”项目的核心问题，该项目迄今为止已在五个州进行了次州调查。我们的项目将在这个比较项目中提供第一个英国数据进行分析。我们的研究问题，详细讨论的情况下，支持，涉及到有争议的理论在选举中的投票行为。我们专注于在何种程度上投票行为是一个功能的身份，问题的立场（特别是在独立问题），意识形态，政府绩效的评估，和领导人的喜好。我们借鉴了大量关于苏格兰投票行为的研究，其中大部分是由以前的苏格兰选举研究数据产生的。我们渴望为公众辩论做出贡献，并促进参与研究过程。我们将在调查开始前举行咨询活动，邀请学术研究人员和学校学生提出调查问题，以易于在线分析的格式提供数据，并将聘请一个沟通团队与主要利益相关者联系。在线研究有助于快速发布研究结果，以便我们能够为有关选举结果的更广泛辩论做出贡献。我们将举办简报活动，制作简报文件，并为期刊和针对顶级大学出版社的专著提供高质量的学术研究。我们还将举办能力建设活动，为中学生和大学生获取数据提供便利。