The Peace Preservation Law in colonial Korea and Taiwan.

通过对日本殖民地（特别是韩国）的《和平保卫法》的制度和执行情况的实证分析，明确了日本本身与韩国制定的《和平保卫法》制度的不同之处。殖民地韩国的法律制度本身与日本不同，政府当局对PPL的概念也大不相同。齐藤总督建议，如果国会不制定《人民保护法》，他将在总督的独立统治下制定《人民保护法》。这一法律最初并非适用于日本，而是适用于韩国。起初，PPL适用于朝鲜独立运动，然后在1930-31年，以“朝鲜独立=劫夺帝国领土，减少国家政体（国台）主权规则变化”的形式确立了司法先例。这条法律被更广泛地解释为，它不仅针对独立运动，也针对居住在韩国以外的韩国人。在被逮捕和起诉的人中，居住在“帝国领土”之外的朝鲜人比例相当高。该法律也被广泛解释为适用于与中国共产党有联系的朝鲜人。韩国执行《刑事诉讼法》的一个主要特点是判处死刑。在迄今为止的研究中，没有任何仅仅因为违反这项法律而被判处死刑的例子。但很明显，至少有一个这样的案例。在20世纪30年代至40年代的皈依政策下，韩国人被严重强迫皈依。加强“国民精神”和“帝国精神”的政策，建立监视和教育制度，针对那些受到保护观察的人的日常生活的各个方面，这是朝鲜所特有的。预防性拘留制度首先在韩国建立，然后在日本建立。这样，如果不考虑殖民地的实际情况，就不能把握和了解殖民地人民解放运动的全部历史。少

Based on this evidential examination of the system and implementation of the Peace Preservation Law (PPL) in the Japanese colonies (particularly Korea), the following points have been made clear regarding the differences between Japan itself and the PPL system as it was constructed in Korea.The legal system itself in colonial Korea was different from that in Japan itself, and the conception of the governmental authorities regarding the PPL was also quite different. Governor General Saito suggested that if the PPL were not established in the Diet, he would enact the PPL under the independent rule of the Governor General.This law was initially applied not in Japan itself, but to cases in Korea. At first, the PPL was applied to the Korean independence movement, and then in 1930-31, the judicial precedent was established in the form of "Korean independence = the robbery of Imperial territory the reduction of sovereign rule change in the national polity (Kokutai)".This law was more widely i … More nterpreted as it was aimed not only at the independence movement, but also at Koreans living outside of Korea. Among those arrested and indicted, the proportion of Koreans living outside "Imperial territory" was quite high. The law also came to be more widely interpreted as it was applied to Koreans who were affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party.A major characteristic of the implementation of the PPL in Korea is that the death sentence was handed down. In the research up to this point, there are no examples of the death sentence resulting only from violations against this law. But it is clear that there was at least one such case.Under the policy of conversion during the 1930's-40's, Koreans were severely coerced to convert. The strengthening of the policies of "Naisen ittai" and "Imperial spirit" and the establishment of the system of surveillance and education aimed at all aspects of daily life of those under protective observation were particular to Korea. The system of preventive detention was first established in Korea prior to its establishment in Japan itself.In this way, we cannot grasp or understand the entire history of the PPL if we disregard the actual situation in the colonies. Less