Judgments in judge-advisor-systems with multiple advisors

建议的利用是日常生活中判断和决策不可或缺的一部分。虽然在只有一个顾问的情况下，建议的利用已经得到了广泛的研究，但到目前为止，人们对如何将多个建议整合到个人判断中知之甚少。在这个研究计划中，我们的目标是通过专门调查具有多名顾问的情况的特点的主题来缩小这一差距。首先，我们想要证明，多重建议的表达方式的不同会影响判决过程的结果。因此，我们将多个建议的同时呈现与顺序呈现进行比较。在下一步中，我们提出了一个在顺序建议呈现过程中降低建议权重的模型，并测试了该模型的总体有效性以及它对顺序效应的敏感性。最后，我们讨论了如何在判断过程中加权和使用聚合建议(即单个建议样本的平均值)的问题。我们的发现应该有助于加深我们对如何利用和整合建议的理解，也应该促进旨在优化使用多种建议的干预措施的发展。

Advice utilization is an integral part of judgment and decision making in everyday life. Whereas advice utilization in situations with one single advisor has been extensively studied, so far only very little is known about how multiple advice is integrated into individual judgments. In this research program we aim at closing this gap by specifically investigating topics that are characteristic of situations with multiple advisors. First, we want to demonstrate that differences in the presentation of multiple advice affect the outcome of the judgment process. Therefore, we compare the simultaneous presentation of multiple advice with a sequential presentation. In the next step, we present a model of decreasing advice weighting during sequential advice presentation and test the general validity of this model as well as its sensitivity for order effects. Finally, we address the question of how aggregated advice (i.e. the mean of a sample of individual advices) is weighted and used in the judgment process. Our findings should help to deepen our understanding of how advice is utilized and integrated, and it should also facilitate the development of interventions aimed at optimizing the use of multiple advice.