The Pilgerfahrt des träumenden Mönchs (PTM). A synoptic and commented edition of the three Rhine Franconian translations of a late medieval allegory by Guillaume de Digulleville

法国诗篇《Pèlerinage de vie humaine》由法国纪尧姆·德·迪格鲁维尔修道院在1330-1331年左右创作，是中世纪晚期用当地语言写成的宗教诗歌中最成功的作品之一。在中世纪，它被翻译成英语、西班牙语、荷兰语和德语，在15世纪，仅德语就被翻译了四次。虽然梅罗埃德的彼得(死于1451年)的米德尔弗兰科尼亚/里普里亚诗句的翻译仍然没有被考虑，但这三个在多种方面相关的莱茵弗兰科尼亚版本在这个项目中占据了中心舞台。今天保存在达姆施塔特(PTM D)和汉堡(PTM H)的贝勒堡手稿(PTM B)和两个散文版本的Pilgerfahrt des Träumenden Mönchs(Pilgerfahrt des Träumenden Mönchs，Pilgerfahrt des Träumenden Mö这一文本版本的补充是一个注释，它更密切地检查了三个莱茵弗兰科尼亚版本之间的关系，到目前为止，主要通过对手稿出处历史的调查和对这些翻译的语言的研究，特别是在2009年至2013年由申请人指导和DFG资助的一个研究项目的推动下。评论将特别调查翻译者或翻译者的神学/科学知识，手稿出处的历史为翻译提供的提示对拿骚-萨尔布吕肯家族的实用意义，最后这些版本的具体语言特点以及每一本莱茵河弗朗科尼亚版本的PTM中所包含的插图的作用。

The French verse allegory Pèlerinage de vie humaine, written around1330-31 by the French Cistersian Guillaume de Digulleville, was oneof the largest successes of late medieval religious poetry in thevernacular languages. Still during the Middle Ages, it was translated inEnglish, Spanish, Dutch and German, in German alone four timesduring the fifteenth century. Whereas the MiddleFranconian/Ripuarian verse translation by Peter of Meroede (died1451) remains out of consideration, the three in multiple ways relatedRhine Franconian versions take center stage in this project. The versetranslation contained in a Berleburg manuscript (PTM b) and the twoprose versions of the Pilgerfahrt des träumenden Mönchs (Pilgrimageof the dreaming monk, PTM) preserved today in Darmstadt (PTM d)and Hamburg (PTM h) will be edited in this project, closely followingthe manuscript texts - and for the first time as regards the prosetranslations. This text edition is complemented by a commentarywhich more closely examines the relations of the three RhineFranconian versions to each other, known hitherto mainly byinvestigations of the history of the provenance of the manuscripts andby the study of the language of these translations, especiallypromoted by a research project directed by the applicant and fundedby the DFG between 2009 and 2013. The commentary will investigatein particular the theological/scientifical knowledge of the translator ortranslators, the pragmatic importance of the hints to the House ofNassau-Saarbrücken provided by the history of the provenance of themanuscripts for the origin of the translations, finally the specificlinguistic trait of these versions and the role of the illustrationscontained in every Rhine Franconian version of the PTM.