权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Comparative Study of Higher Education Reform Strategies corresponding to Globalization in Asia

亚洲应对全球化的高等教育改革策略比较研究

基本信息

批准号：
14310120
负责人：
OTSUKA Yutaka
金额：
$ 6.21万
依托单位：
Nagoya University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
2002
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2002 至 2003
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

This research aims at empirically examining from the comparative perspective how globalization has influenced the higher education in Asian countries, and how each country has been responding to it.Research members met together in June, and clarified the focuses of research as follows : (1) prioritized higher education policies corresponding to the globalization in the government level of each country ; (2) characteristics of management at each University especially the relationship with the governments, degree of autonomy, cooperation with private enterprises, and distinguishing curriculum and teaching methods ; and (3) concrete measures to be a world-level center of excellence (COE). In addition to these items, it was also agreed (4) to pay attention to so-called "losers" in competition among domestic higher education institutions in each country in terms of the reform corresponding to the globalization.Field work has been conducted in Thailand, Indonesia, Singapore, and India for ap … More proximately one week respectively. During the fieldwork, the related data and documents were collected, and each member met higher education planners and policy-makers as well as university administrators of the COE in each country to understand how the reform strategies of higher education had been carried out. These results were gathered at the general meeting in February 2004 when writing of a report manuscript completed mostly and further cross-cultural comparison was conducted.What have been clarified through our research can be summarized as follows. In Asia following Japan and South Korea, the Philippines, Taiwan, China, Thailand, and Singapore have reached the level of massification, and Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam, and India are moving toward the mass higher education by way of diversifying the system. Moreover, following phenomena common to the high education reform in Asian countries can be recognized : (1) Policy priority is put on strengthening the global competitiveness ; (2) A few selected universities are heavily invested and differentiation among institutions is becoming remarkable ; (3) A small number of research university is being hurriedly improved and graduate school education is being strengthened as a concrete measure ; (4)As for internal aspects of education, IT education and foreign language education, especially English education are being strengthened ; (5) In order to maintain and improve the quality of higher education, university evaluation led by the government is carried out. Less

本研究旨在从比较的角度实证考察全球化对亚洲国家高等教育的影响以及各国的应对措施。研究成员于6月召开会议，明确了研究重点如下：（1）各国政府层面与全球化相对应的优先高等教育政策；（2）各大学的管理特点，特别是与政府的关系、自主程度、与私营企业的合作、课程设置和教学方法等方面的特点；（3）建设世界级卓越中心（COE）的具体措施。除这些项目外，还商定（4）在应对全球化的改革方面，关注各国国内高等教育机构竞争中的所谓“失败者”。实地工作已分别在泰国、印度尼西亚、新加坡和印度进行了约一周。在实地考察过程中，收集了相关数据和文件，每位成员会见了各国高等教育规划者和政策制定者以及COE的大学管理人员，了解高等教育改革战略的实施情况。这些结果是在2004年2月的股东大会上收集的，当时报告稿的撰写已基本完成，并进行了进一步的跨文化比较。通过我们的研究澄清的内容可以总结如下。在亚洲，继日本、韩国之后，菲律宾、台湾、中国、泰国、新加坡已经达到了大众化的水平，马来西亚、印度尼西亚、越南、印度则通过制度多元化的方式走向高等教育大众化。此外，亚洲国家高等教育改革还存在以下普遍现象：（1）政策重点放在增强全球竞争力上；（2）少数精选大学投入较大，院校分化明显；（三）抓紧完善少数研究型大学，加强研究生教育作为具体措施；（4）教育内部方面，信息技术教育和外语教育，特别是英语教育正在加强；（五）为了保持和提高高等教育质量，开展政府主导的大学评估。较少的