权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

JOINT RESEARCH FOR NEW HISTORY OF INDIAN LOGIC

印度逻辑新史联合研究

基本信息

批准号：
11694005
负责人：
KATSURA Shoryu
金额：
$ 2.94万
依托单位：
HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B).
财政年份：
1999
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1999 至 2000
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

The aim of this project is to reconstruct a new 'History of Indian Logic' not only from a logical point of view but also from other multiple perspectives, such as ontology, epistemology and linguistic philosophy, on the basis of recent results of research in various fields of Indian philosophy. The project also aims at publishing it in the near future. For that purpose we had the cooperation with the colleagues of the Universities of Vienna and Lausanne as well as McGill University. The Head investigator, Shoryu Katsura, is going to write a new History of Indian Logic together with Profs.Gillon (McGill) and Tillemans (Lausanne) and Dr.Prets (Vienna). For the last two years scholars from all over the world got together to hold a panel on Indian logic in Lausanne (IABS 1999) and Montreal (ICANAS 2000).The report contains the papers of the members of this project related to Hiroshima University, which were presented at those two panels, as well as other articles written by them for the la … More st two years.Katsura's Article 1 traces the development of debate tradition in India, and Article 2 examines the general characteristic of Indian logic from the view points of deduction, induction and abduction. Article 3 traces the development of Indian Buddhist logic by examining the three most important Buddhist philosophers, viz.Nagarjuna, Dignaga and Dharmakirti. Article 4 clarifies the debate techniques of Nagarjuna by the analysis of his debate with the Naiyayikas.Three Articles by Ogawa discusses Bhartrhari's contributions to Indian logic ; he is the most important scholar of Indian linguistic philosophy.Honda's Article deals with Bhartrhari's epistemology, especially, the problem of pratibha.Two Articles by Inami respectively deals with Dharmakirti's theories of causation and other mind.Finally Katsura's Article 6 examines Dharmakirti's theory of path to liberation.Proceedings of those two panels mentioned able will be edited and published by our colleagues in Vienna and McGill. Less

该项目的目的是重建一个新的“印度逻辑史”，不仅从逻辑的角度来看，而且从其他多个角度，如本体论，认识论和语言哲学，在印度哲学的各个领域的研究成果的基础上。该项目还打算在不久的将来出版。为此，我们与维也纳大学、洛桑大学以及麦吉尔大学的同事进行了合作。首席研究员Shoryu Katenyi将与Gillon（麦吉尔）和Tillemans（洛桑）教授以及Prets博士（维也纳）一起撰写一部新的印度逻辑史。在过去的两年里，来自世界各地的学者聚集在一起，在洛桑（IABS 1999）和蒙特利尔（ICANAS 2000）举行了一个关于印度逻辑的小组讨论会。报告包含了该项目成员在这两个小组讨论会上提交的与广岛大学有关的论文，以及他们为该小组讨论会撰写的其他文章。 ...更多信息卡特罗的第一篇追溯了印度辩论传统的发展，第二篇从演绎、归纳和溯因三个方面考察了印度逻辑的一般特征。第三篇通过考察三位最重要的佛教哲学家，即龙树、天伽和法身，追溯了印度佛教逻辑的发展。第四章通过分析龙树那与奈耶耶卡的辩论，阐明龙树那的辩论技巧。本田的文章论述了印度语言哲学家巴特哈里的认识论，特别是，实生的问题。稻波的两篇文章分别论述了法身的因果理论和他心理论。最后，卡丹的第六篇文章探讨了以上提到的两个专题小组的论文集将由我们在维也纳和麦吉尔的同事编辑出版。少