权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A Development study of Benchmarks on ODA Evaluation in Education

教育ODA评价基准的制定研究

基本信息

批准号：
14380074
负责人：
MUTA Hiromitsu
金额：
$ 9.22万
依托单位：
Tokyo Institute of Technology
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
2002
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2002 至 2005
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-14380074/
关键词：
International Cooperation Evaluation Method External Effect Rate of Return Cost-Effectiveness Program Evaluation Outcome Intermediate Index 満足度 2次評価レイティング国際教育協力

项目摘要

This research aimed to develop benchmark indexes of ODA evaluation in the field of educational technology from the viewpoint of making evaluation more objective. The difficult items to evaluate in international education cooperation were social impact or external effects. For example, calculation of a social rate of return to education and training is a useful method to evaluate a education or training project, however, the collection of necessary data isn't necessarily easy. So, it was analyzed by using the technique to ask about the amount of payment will as one of the ways of measuring the externality of the education and training. It was shown that the impact of the short-term training measured by the total amount of payment will was more than the cost when all of the transmission of the skills and knowledge through lecture, writing articles, consultation etc. are consideredIt is said that an outcome and an impact are important as an effect of the international education cooperation. However, it isn't clear whether an outcome or an impact was caused by the project, and it is important to clear the causal relationship to evaluate the attribution of the project on outcomes and impacts.Furthermore, as it usually takes time to realize an impact, it is necessary to find an appropriate intermediate indexes which would lead to an impact in future. For example, when the effects of an educational development project in Indonesia were analyzed, an interest to study, an active participation in a class, and tendency to learn from others are used as intermediate indexes although the final impact was scholastic achievement. Moreover, a degree of satisfaction was used in the class evaluation analysis as an intermediate index.

本研究旨在从使评价更加客观的角度出发，制定教育技术领域ODA评价的基准指标。国际教育合作中最难评估的项目是社会影响或外部效应。例如，计算教育和培训的社会回报率是评估教育或培训项目的有用方法，但收集必要的数据并不容易。因此，采用询问支付意愿的方法作为衡量教育培训外部性的方法之一进行分析。结果表明，如果考虑到通过讲座、文章撰写、咨询等方式传播技能和知识，以支付总额衡量的短期培训的影响将大于成本。据说，作为国际教育合作的效果，结果和影响非常重要。然而，成果或影响是否是由项目造成的并不清楚，重要的是要明确因果关系，以评估项目对成果和影响的归因。此外，由于影响通常需要时间才能实现，因此需要找到一个适当的中间指标来在未来产生影响。例如，在分析印度尼西亚的一个教育发展项目的效果时，虽然最终影响是学业成绩，但以学习兴趣、课堂积极参与和向他人学习的倾向作为中间指标。此外，在班级评价分析中使用了满意度作为中间指标。