Mutual Construction of ADR Act and ADR Practice : Socio-legal approach to Mutual Construction Process of Law and Practice

在本研究中，笔者以ADR立法前后的ADR实践的转变过程为中心，围绕ADR实践的法律渗透与适应、北美促进调解模式的引进及其影响、日本ADR机构新建立的实践模式的有效性等三个主题进行了考察。研究结果表明，虽然北美在实践中构成了基本的沟通模式，但法律的或其他专业的评价被有效地调动起来。这可以看出日本将北美模式改编为日本设置。另一方面，不同程序混合运行所带来的法律的问题和风险尚未解决。

In this research, I examined the process of transformation of ADR practice during the period before and after introduction of ADR legislation focusing on three topics including 1) penetration and adaptation of law in the process of constituting ADR Practice, 2) introduction of North American facilitative mediation model and its influence and 3) validity of newly established practice model of Japanese ADR institutions. The result shows that although North American constitutes basic communication model in their practice, legal or another professional evaluation is effectively mobilized. This can be seen Japanese adaptation of North American model into Japanese settings. On the other hand the legal problems and risks in the mixture of different procedure is not yet settled.