DIAGNOSIS IN CHILD PSYCHIATRY

几个DSM-III诊断的有效性仍然存在争议。 多个中心正在进行研究，以解决有效性问题 情境和交叉之间的诊断区别 情境性多动与强迫症之间 强迫症(OCD)、亚临床OCD和强迫人格 无序。 在英国，非常强调跨情境 多动症(基于家长和教师的行为评级)。这 将使用24小时运动活动测量来验证区别 为伦敦和华盛顿的多动症儿童和控制者准备的。 强迫症、亚临床型强迫症、强迫症区分的有效性 正在进行评估的是：对评分员之间可靠性的研究， 相关特征和家庭研究，以及后续状况。

The validity of several DSM-III diagnoses remains controversial. Studies are underway across several centers addressing the validity of the diagnostic distinction between situational and cross situational hyperactivity, and between obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), subclinical OCD, and compulsive personality disorder. In the U.K., great emphasis is placed upon cross situational hyperactivity (based on parent and teacher behavior ratings). This distinction will be validated using 24-hour motor activity measure for hyperactive children and controls in London and Washington. The validity of the distinction between OCD, subclinical OCD, OCP is being assessed with: studies of interrater reliability, associated features and family studies, and follow-up status.