JOINT RESEARCH FOR NEW HISTORY OF INDIAN LOGIC

这个项目的目的是在印度哲学各个领域的最新研究成果的基础上，不仅从逻辑的角度，而且从其他多个角度，如本体论、认识论和语言哲学，重建一部新的《印度逻辑史》。该项目还计划在不久的将来出版。为此目的，我们与维也纳大学和洛桑大学以及麦吉尔大学的同事进行了合作。首席研究员Shoryu Katsura将与Gillon(McGill)教授、Tillemans(洛桑)和Dr.Prets(维也纳)共同撰写一部新的印度逻辑史。在过去的两年里，来自世界各地的学者聚集在一起，在洛桑(IABS 1999)和蒙特利尔(ICANAS 2000)举办了一个关于印度逻辑的小组讨论。报告包含了该项目成员在这两个小组中提交的与广岛大学有关的论文，以及他们为La…撰写的其他文章第二章从演绎、归纳和演绎的角度考察了印度逻辑的一般特征。第三章通过考察三位最重要的佛教哲学家，即那迦诸那、迪尼亚加和达摩吉提，来追溯印度佛教逻辑的发展。第四篇文章通过分析那迦朱纳与乃耶伊卡的辩论，阐明了他的辩论技巧。小川的三篇文章讨论了巴特哈里对印度逻辑的贡献，他是印度语言哲学最重要的学者。本田的文章涉及巴特哈里的认识论，特别是Pratibha的问题。稻奈美的两篇文章分别涉及达摩基尔蒂的因果论和其他心智。最后，卡塔拉的第六条考察了达摩吉尔蒂的解放之路理论。上述两个小组的会议记录将由我们在维也纳和麦吉尔的同事编辑和发表。较少

The aim of this project is to reconstruct a new 'History of Indian Logic' not only from a logical point of view but also from other multiple perspectives, such as ontology, epistemology and linguistic philosophy, on the basis of recent results of research in various fields of Indian philosophy. The project also aims at publishing it in the near future. For that purpose we had the cooperation with the colleagues of the Universities of Vienna and Lausanne as well as McGill University. The Head investigator, Shoryu Katsura, is going to write a new History of Indian Logic together with Profs.Gillon (McGill) and Tillemans (Lausanne) and Dr.Prets (Vienna). For the last two years scholars from all over the world got together to hold a panel on Indian logic in Lausanne (IABS 1999) and Montreal (ICANAS 2000).The report contains the papers of the members of this project related to Hiroshima University, which were presented at those two panels, as well as other articles written by them for the la … More st two years.Katsura's Article 1 traces the development of debate tradition in India, and Article 2 examines the general characteristic of Indian logic from the view points of deduction, induction and abduction. Article 3 traces the development of Indian Buddhist logic by examining the three most important Buddhist philosophers, viz.Nagarjuna, Dignaga and Dharmakirti. Article 4 clarifies the debate techniques of Nagarjuna by the analysis of his debate with the Naiyayikas.Three Articles by Ogawa discusses Bhartrhari's contributions to Indian logic ; he is the most important scholar of Indian linguistic philosophy.Honda's Article deals with Bhartrhari's epistemology, especially, the problem of pratibha.Two Articles by Inami respectively deals with Dharmakirti's theories of causation and other mind.Finally Katsura's Article 6 examines Dharmakirti's theory of path to liberation.Proceedings of those two panels mentioned able will be edited and published by our colleagues in Vienna and McGill. Less