The Process of Solving Conflict in Overlapped Marine Institutions from the point of Governance

本研究从国际政治理论的角度，思考制度互动的主题，也就是我们有时所说的“冲突”，已经达到什麽程度，以及尚未解决的问题。并对国际法不成体系与制度互动的区别进行了分析。然后选取了两个海洋领域的机构互动案例：（1）2010年大西洋金枪鱼政府间渔业组织（ICCAT）与CITES（濒危野生动植物种国际贸易公约）;（2）《生物多样性公约<th>》缔约方第10次会议与联合国其他机构。为什么不讨论国家管辖范围以外的海洋保护区？它暂时得出的结论是，大国并不一定影响制度冲突的协调，但发展中国家也利用它来审查发达国家在过去进行的论坛购物所制定的现有制度。到目前为止，研究者选取的案例都是环境机构的案例，我的上述发现是否适用于其他案例是我未来研究的问题。

From the point of theory of International Politics, this research thinks about to what point theme of institutional interaction, which sometimes we say "conflict, " have reached and its unsolved questions. Also I analyze the difference between institutional interaction and fragmentation of international law, which was one of the main subjects of International Law Commission recently. Then I pick up two institutional interaction cases from marine areas as follows :(1) Inter-Governmental fishery organization for tuna in the Atlantic Ocean(ICCAT) and CITES in 2010(2) The 10^<th> Convention of the Parties on CBD and other UN institutions. Why did the marine protected areas beyond national jurisdiction not be discussed? It temporarily concluded that big powers had not necessarily influenced the coordination of institutional conflict, but developing countries had made use of it to review existed institutions made by developed countries in past doing forum-shopping also. Up to the present, cases picked by researchers are those of environmental institutions, it is my future research question that what I have found mentioned above would be appropriate to the other cases.