Engineering Design Process Portfolio Scoring Rubric (EDPPSR)

工程设计流程组合评分标准 (EDPPSR)

• 批准号: 1118755
• 负责人: Leigh Abts
• 金额: $ 79.99万
• 依托单位: University of Maryland, College Park
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 2011
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2011-09-01 至 2017-08-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1118755&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Engineering; Design; Process; Portfolio; Scoring

Currently there are numerous opportunities for students to participate in design-based experiences organized by local schools and clubs, government laboratories and national organizations. While these programs can inspire students' interest in STEM, there are no commonly accepted frameworks to benchmark learning and instruction in order to study students' growth in STEM knowledge and skills or their self-efficacy and persistence to pursue STEM or to recognize their achievements based on common measures.The purpose of this proposal, "Engineering Design Process Portfolio Scoring Rubric (EDPPSR)" is to test the efficacy of the EDPPSR scoring system that could be applied to differentiate levels of performance in the domain of the engineering design based projects. The intent of the study is to determine the reliability and validity of the EDPPSR across student work produced in diverse contexts (formal versus informal, low versus high stakes, high school versus college) and under different conditions (individual versus group work, self-initiated versus assigned, etc.). The proposed study is a critical step in the scale-up of a validated and reliable scoring tool that could be used to evaluate design-based projects and to inform instructional practice. Specifically, the EDPPSR is proposed as the format for a future engineering advanced placement exam. The research questions which will guide the project are:1. Which types of artifacts provided as portfolio entries may constitute evidence of proficiency in each ESPPSR element?2. How will artifact types be likely to differ within/across diverse contexts and conditions?3. Do the rubric criteria address any content extraneous to the engineering design process or are any irrelevant to the construct?4. Do criteria accurately and fully address all elements of the engineering design process?A validated and reliable ESPPSR could potentially lead to students gaining admission, recognition or even undergraduate placement credit for their project-based activities and could impact the recruitment of talented students into the STEM pipeline and could inform the recruitment of students from under-represented groups.

目前，学生有很多机会参加由当地学校和俱乐部，政府实验室和国家组织组织的基于设计的经验。 尽管这些计划可以激发学生对STEM的兴趣，但没有普遍接受的框架来基于学习和教学，以便研究学生在STEM知识和技能方面的增长，或者他们的自我效能和持久性追求STEM或基于共同度量的成就。区分基于工程设计项目的领域的性能水平。该研究的目的是确定在各种情况下（正式与非正式，低赌注，高中与大学）以及不同条件（个人工作与小组工作，自我启动与分配等等等）的学生作品中EDPPSR的可靠性和有效性。拟议的研究是验证且可靠的评分工具扩大规模的关键步骤，该工具可用于评估基于设计的项目并为教学实践提供信息。具体而言，提出EDPPSR作为未来工程高级安排考试的格式。指导该项目的研究问题是：1。提供的用于投资组合条目的哪种类型的工件可能构成每个ESPPSR元素熟练的证据？2。在各种环境和条件之间/条件之间/条件下，工件类型可能会有所不同？3。专栏标准是否涉及工程设计过程无关的内容，或者与结构无关？4。标准是否准确并充分解决了工程设计过程的所有要素？经过验证且可靠的ESPPSR可能会导致学生因其基于项目的活动而获得入学，认可，甚至是本科生的学分，并可能影响有才华的学生进入STEM管道，并可以将学生从不足的小组中招募。