权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Development of university lesson improvement method through co-operative work with digital teaching portfolios by two teachers.

通过两名教师与数字教学档案的合作开发大学课程改进方法。

基本信息

批准号：
15500639
负责人：
MIO Tadao
金额：
$ 2.37万
依托单位：
Waseda University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2003
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2003 至 2005
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-15500639/
关键词：
Faculty Development Teaching Portfolio Higher Education Pure Review Method of Improving_Instruction Skils DAIFUKU-CHO ピュア・レビュー大福帳 FD

项目摘要

The aim of this research is to develop the method of improving lesson plans between two teachers at different organizations through the co-operative analysis using their electric teaching portfolios (TP). TPs are made for assessing objectively the contents of their lessons. Information on each stage has been shared between teachers from the early developing stage as the trial, the evaluation and the improvement one. The teachers are at different organizations but in the same specialty.(1)Accumulating Electric Teaching Portfolios of two teachers, who are author and the partaker.Every materials, students' evaluation and pre- post self evaluation on each lesson are recorded as Electric TP. As for new subject, logs of mutual comments, which are categorized, on contents and student information are added on it. Electric TP making is simple work and helps teachers more precise improvement. However we found that this method is not applicable for every year as the work for improvement makes tea … More chers' work heavy load.(2)Analysis on the co-operative working process of developing the lesson materials and its method of evaluating students.Mutual evaluation processes are analyzed on material development, material usages and the method of evaluating students of two teachers' subject mattersDifference of the ways to give tasks to students and the evaluation methods of those tasks were brought out and comments were added on them. Teachers' intentions for lessons were mutually understood more through sitting in on a class, which lead to their effective improvement of each lessons.Comments on the report task as mutual evaluating work were accomplished with different methods by each teachers and those reflecting methods were also different. These teachers' feedbacks are evaluated high by students as class evaluation. Students' class evaluation on reporting task will be analyzed to relate with the main goal as our future task.Performance test to students was the last by this year, as the amount of every lesson's preparation for materials and discussion on research of class evaluation has not been decreased even after several years has been passed. This took time so teachers can not use time for class activities.Reviewing system has been developed with multiple choice method and gave the same tasks to both classes. This system can be useful tools for making clear of weights on the lesson contents as it helps teachers to see the difference between them. Less

本研究的目的在于探讨不同组织的两位教师，透过电子教学档案袋的合作分析，来改善教学计画的方法。教学大纲是为了客观地评价他们的课程内容而制定的。从实验、评价、改进的早期发展阶段开始，每个阶段的信息都在教师之间共享。教师在不同的组织，但在同一专业。（1）收集作者和参与者两名教师的电子教案，将每节课的材料、学生评价和课前课后的自我评价记录为电子教案。对于新的学科，增加了对内容进行分类的互评日志和学生信息。电子TP制作是一项简单的工作，有助于教师更精确地改进。然而，我们发现，这种方法并不适用于每年的工作，为改善使茶 ...更多信息工人的工作量很大。（2）合作开发教材的过程及其评价方法分析了两个教师在教材开发、教材使用、评价学生的方法等方面的相互评价过程，提出了任务分配方式和任务评价方法的差异，并进行了评价。通过听课，教师对每节课的教学意图有了更多的了解，从而有效地改进了每节课的教学;对报告任务的评论作为一种相互评价的工作，每位教师采用不同的方法来完成，反映的方法也不同。这些教师的反馈被学生作为课堂评价给予了很高的评价。学生的课堂评价报告任务将被分析与主要目标相关联，作为我们未来的任务。到今年为止，对学生的表现测试是最后一次，因为每节课的准备材料和讨论的数量并没有减少，即使经过几年的研究课堂评价。这需要时间，所以教师不能使用时间进行课堂活动。复习系统已经开发了多项选择法，并给予同样的任务，两个班。这个系统可以是一个有用的工具，明确的权重的课程内容，因为它可以帮助教师看到它们之间的差异。少