Positive Research on"Democratic Nature and Efficiency"in Local Educational Administration

地方教育管理“民主性与效率”的实证研究

基本信息

批准号：
02301039
负责人：
TAKAGI Hideaki
金额：
$ 2.88万
依托单位：
Kyoto University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Co-operative Research (A)
财政年份：
1990
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1990 至 1991
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-02301039/
关键词：
Local educational administration Board of education Democratic nature Democratic nature in substance Democratic nature in Procedure Efficiency Mechanical efficiency Social efficiency 地方自治

项目摘要

After the World War II, in Japan, it was intended to democratize the educational administration thorouffily. The system of board of education was introduced, and the board-members were elected by popular vote and its meetings were opened to the people for its democratic operation. But, in fact, the system was revised soon. The public election of board-members was abandoned and the system of opening the meetings was also banished from the law. It can not be said nevertheless that the principle of democracy was perished from the local educational administration, because it must be operated under the Constitution of Japan which makes the democracy its main pole. At the same time, it must be efficient and effective.It is not easy for us to explicate the mutual relationship between the democratic nature and the efficiency of local educational administration, for those concepts are multivocal and changeable. The democratic aspects of administration are devided into the substantive and procedural sides. And there are two meanings of efficiency ; one is mechanical, and the other is social. According to our research, it has become obvious that the procedual democracy and mechanical efficiency are inevitably contradictory and in the negative correlation each other, but that the procedural democracy and social efficiency are in the positive correlation. The mutual relationship among procedural democracy, mechanical and social efficiencies are intertwined complicatedly, but it is now clear that we can elevate the levels of these elements to some degree uncontradictorily.

第二次世界大战后，在日本，它旨在使教育管理局民主化。引入了教育委员会制度，董事会成员通过民众投票选举，其会议因其民主行动而向人民开放。但是，实际上，该系统很快就进行了修订。董事会成员的公开选举被放弃，开幕会议的制度也从法律中驱逐出境。但是，不能说民主原则从当地的教育管理局中丧生，因为它必须根据日本宪法进行操作，这使民主使民主成为主杆。同时，它必须高效且有效。我们不容易阐明民主性质与当地教育管理的效率之间的相互关系，因为这些概念是多言和多变的。行政的民主方面被传达给实体和程序方面。效率有两种含义；一个是机械的，另一个是社会的。根据我们的研究，很明显，程序民主和机械效率不可避免地是矛盾的，并且在彼此之间存在负相关，但是程序民主和社会效率是正相关的。程序民主，机械和社会效率之间的相互关系变得复杂，但是现在很明显，我们可以在某种程度上毫不犹豫地提高这些要素的水平。